05/04/2026 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Hanobik stated that he had contacted the City in the past and that crews had come out to clean drains, but he believed the issue was related to downstream backups during heavy rain events. Staff further explained that the City Engineer had briefly reviewed the information provided and did not initially feel that the situation demonstrated a practical difficulty, noting that options may exist to place the garage in a zoning -compliant location with appropriate driveway and drainage improvements. Staff also clarified that the application before the Board was specifically for the proposed front -yard detached garage and the oversized garage area. The City Attorney and staff explained that the Board could not provide advisory opinions on hypothetical alternatives, but that the applicant could continue working with staff and the City Engineer to evaluate possible options. It was noted that the applicant appeared to be making a good -faith effort but may need additional review to determine the best path forward while complying with zoning and drainage requirements. Board members asked whether the applicant had received feedback from neighbors. Mr. Hanobik stated that he had discussed the proposal with nearby neighbors and that they did not object. He also clarified that the proposed garage would not be used for a business, but only for personal vehicles, tools, lawn equipment, and minor personal or neighbor repairs. A Board member suggested that, given the drainage concerns and the applicant's efforts to explore different options, the matter could benefit from further review by the City Engineer and additional discussion with City staff. The applicant agreed that tabling the matter would be helpful. The case was therefore requested to be tabled so the applicant could coordinate with staff and the City Engineer before returning at a future meeting. Mr. Ammons made a motion to table to next month, case 427-2026; James Hanobik; 6397 Barton Rd.; seconded by Ms. Galateanu. Motion passed: 5-0 COMMERCIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS 429-2026; Chase Bank; 4824 Great Northern Blvd. Case No. 429-2026, Chase Bank, 4824 Great Northern Boulevard, was presented as a request for variances related to new wall signage. The applicant was identified as a representative of Archer Corporation, located at 1917 Henry Avenue SW in Canton. Staff explained that the proposal included two variance requests. The first was a 13.49 -square - foot variance for secondary wall sign area, as code permitted 22 square feet and the applicant