My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/24/1987 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1987
>
1987 Planning Commission
>
02/24/1987 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:30:52 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 3:17:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1987
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ., t . <br />XA <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES - FEBRUARY 24,.1987 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Burns called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m. <br />Present: R. Bierman, B. Gorris, T. Morgan, J. Thomas, E. Traczyk, and <br />J. Burns. Mr. Thomas, a new member, had been sworn in by the <br />Mayor previously. <br />Also Present: Assistant Law Director J. Dubelko, City Engineer J. Schaller, <br />Acting Building Commissioner D. Sanker, Councilmen R. Tallon <br />and R. Wilamosky, and-Clerk of Commissions B. Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />B. Gorris moved to approve the Minutes of February 10, 1987 as submitted, <br />seconded by E. Traczyk, and unanimously approved. <br />III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REOUESTS: <br />1) Space Age Industrial Design, Bradley Road (southwest of 31157) <br />Proposal to construct building in Limited Industrial Area. <br />(Heard by the Architectural Board of Review February 18, 1987) <br />The Architectural Board of Review had approved proposal as submitted <br />with the suggestions that the.p arking spaces in the front of the b uild- <br />ing be landbanked and that dumpster in the rear be comnletely enclosed <br />with a gate on the front. Police Department had some questions as to <br />the design of the building on the west and south sides in view of the <br />possibility of break-ins and also questioned the delivery vehicles <br />which might have to back in or out onto Bradley Road. The Fire Depart- <br />ment had no objection but advised that water for fire protection must <br />be nrovided. The forester advised that he will be working with the <br />developer to save as ma.ny trees as possible. Mr. Hardy again stated <br />he rarely had deliveries by tractor-trailers, delivery is usually by <br />United Parcel Service. In reference to the parking in the front set <br />back which had been questioned previously, Assistant Law Director <br />Dubelko advised that Section 1191:03 of the ordinance on the Limited <br />Industrial Area prohibits.parking in the front set back, except for <br />the loading and unloading of passengers. It was clarified that the <br />set back was at the actual building line, not just the minimum 50 feet <br />required (this building is set back 133 feet). Mr. DelGuidice, the <br />architect, stated that they are trying to save as many trees as possible <br />and did not want to pave in back. Mr. Sanker advised that, according <br />to the code, thev need 4 parking spaces for the shop and 13 for the <br />office, ulus visitor parking which was determined to be 5 spaces. <br />Mr. Hardy stated he only has 9 employees, and rarely has more than <br />2 visitors at a time. Mr. Dubelko's internretation of the-industrial <br />? parking requirements are that the parking does not have to be broken <br />down by office use and shop use, that the entire parking should be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.