01/07/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH. OLMSTED BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES -- JANUARY 7, 1987 Chairman Remmel called the meeting to arder at 7:30 p.m, Present: R. Bugala, R, Gomersall, B. Grace, J. Helon, and C. Remmel Also Present: Law. Director Gareau, Building Commissioner S. Spino, and Clerk of Commissions B. Oring. R. Bugala moved to aceept the mi.nutes of December 3, 1986 as presented, seconded by J. Helon, and unanimously approved. Election of Officers: R. Bugala moved to nominate Chester Remmel as Chairman for the Board of Zoning Appeals for the City of North Olmsted, seconded. by B. Grace. No otfier nominations were made. Roll call on motion: Bugala, Grace, Gomersall, and Helon, Yes. Mr. Remmel abstained. C. Remmel moved to nominate Ronald Bugala for Vice-Chairman, seconded. by J. Helon. No other nominations were made. Roll call on motion: Remmel, Helon, Gomersall, and Grace, Yes. Mr. Bugala abstained. 1. GTen, Penrod, 7100' Barton Road ' Request for ruling. (1133.09).. Request ruling to allow a pavilion (aTready constructed) in a residential area. Not a permitted use in Ord. 62--33, - Section- 1151. 04.? -°" Chairman Remisie-l. ealled alT interested parti:es before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Penrod, J. Young, Ctirist The King Community; S. Kurczy, a neighbor, and B. Grace (a memlier of the Board.) also a neighbor. Mr. RemmeT expTained that there was no provision• for a pavilion• in the zoning codes so-tlie Board will have to rule under what elassification it shouTd be-eonsidered. Mr. Grace stated that, after some discuss.ion, it was decided to consider the pavilion as a similar use to a shed. Variances are: requir•ed.for size and location. Mr. Penrod explained that there was an existing b uilding at this location which collapsed. He was advised'by the Building Department that he could not replace the cement block building under the current codes, and was advised that the former Building Commis- sion would call him back. The Building Commissioner did not call back, nor did he return subsequent calls. He then built the 12 foot high; open pavilion on the existing foundation. C. Remmel moved that respond- irig.to' the request for a ruling, that the Board has taken it under advisement,and it is their decision to classify the structure as a shed, subject to all the standards of a shed as reflected in our zoning regu- lations, seconded by R. Bugala, and unanimously approved.. Mr. Remmel stated that the variance would be limited to the structure as it stands now. C. Remmel moved to grant a 284 square foot variance for a shed, a height variance of 4 feet, and a location variance 75 feet from th.e rear lot line, 42 feet from the southern lot line, and 23 feet from the northern lot line and 105 feet from the garage, with the stipulation