My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/26/1988 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1988
>
1988 Planning Commission
>
01/26/1988 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:05 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 3:49:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1988
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/26/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF NORTA OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1988 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Morgan called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. <br />Present: M. Betts, R. Bierman, B. Gorris, J. Thomas, E. Traczyk, and <br />T. Morgan. <br />Also Present: Assistant Law Director J. Dubelko, Building Commissioner <br />D. Conway, Consulting City Engineer T. Boyer, and Clerk of <br />Commissions B. Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />J. Thomas moved to approve the Planning Commission minutes of January 12, 1988, <br />seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. <br />III. BUILDIrIG DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />1) Columbia Village Apartments, Phase III, (Realtek Industries), located to <br />rear of lots on the north side of Lorain.Road between Columbia and Root <br />Roads. <br />Proposal to construct Phase III in existing apartment and condominium <br />complex. (Variance granted by Board of Zonirig-Appe.als December 2, 1987)._ <br />Heard b,y Architectural Board of Review January 205 1988, <br />Mr..Mongello, architect, and Mr. King, attorney, advised that a landscape <br />plan for the front of the units had been submitted and approved by Mr. <br />Zergott as required at the Architectural Board of Review meeting. The <br />Safety Department report stated no objections to plan; Fire Department <br />advised that water for fire protection must be provided.as required bv <br />ordinance. The forester had suggested that they plant a taller species <br />of juniper among the pine trees; and.requested a meeting with the con- <br />tractor prior to any work being done in order to work with them to save <br />a row of trees between the proposed building and the church. Mr. Mongello <br />agreed to meet with the forester. The Architectural Board requested that <br />the dumpster be enclosed on all four sides. At that meeting representatives • <br />from John Knox Church had requested-a fence on their common property line. <br />Mr. King, attorney, stated that after his research of the cocle, he does <br />not believe that the intent of the code would require them to screen . <br />their residential pronerty from the church's parking lot and garage which <br />he believes would be a commercial use. Assistant Law Director Dubelko <br />stated that the Commission would have the descreation to req.uire a <br />fence.or laridscape features regardless of which property is the more- <br />commercial. Mr. Mongello pointed out that they are landscaping this , <br />property line and he too, does not believe that a fence should be re- <br />quired. .?Mr. Mongello advised that the property is being surveye.d._noxa?.and , <br />an assembly plat will be submi.tted. Building Commissioner Conway.advised <br />that parking on Phase III does conform to code. Commission studied the . <br />plans for the former ohases of the complex, and since part o:f Phase II : <br />is now becoming Phase III, they would like to see au over aTl plan which <br />shows how the two phases are tied in tog,ether, as well as the parking
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.