01/22/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES--JANUARY 22, 1992 CONFIItIIVCE ROOM - 5: 30 P a M. I. ROLL CALL: Acting Chairman Gallagher called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Present: T. Gallagher and Y. Sohn. Absent: M. Case and B. Zergott II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: Mr. Zergott had advised the clerk prior to the meeting, that in the minutes of the special meeting in November, it should be stated that Mr. Zergott was present, (T. Gallagher was listed twice). T. Gallagher moved to accept the minutes of November 7, 1991 as corrected, seconded by Y. Sohn, and unanimously approved. T. Gallagher moved to accept the minutes of October 16, 1991, November 20, 1991, and December 18, 1991 as presented, seconded by Y. Sohn and unanimously approved. It was noted that Mr. Zergott had also stated that he had no problem with these minutes. III. SIGNS: 1) Shell Oil Company, 23385 Lorain Road Signage for Food Mart. Referred by the Building Commissioner Mr. Moore and Mr. Coburn presented the plans. Mr. Coburn explained that after they had received all approvals for rebuilding the station at Clague and Lorain, including the signs, Shell introduced a new franchise called Experience The Difference Food Marts and the previous signs have to be changed from Food Mart to E.T.D. Building Commissioner Conway explained that no variance was required for the wall sign, but the existin,g pole sign is not in conformance, but it will not be changed. Mr. Moore explained that the 3 by 6 foot reader board on the pole sign will be removed. Mr. Coburn advised that this would be a typical internally lighted box sign. In response to Mr. Gallagher's question, Mr. Moore stated that the building will be washed with light. It was further clarified that the building would be sided with stonex panels, and the lower band will be a high grade plastic. The members had no problem with this sign as long as the size conforms to code. T. Gallagher moved that the sign be approved as presented, seconded by Y. Sohn, and imanimously approved. 2) NTC Movies, Great Northern P1aza North. Wall sign. Referred liy Plann-ing Commission 1/14/92 as required in Section 1163.12-(i). Building Commissioner Conway explained that there is a section in the new code that required Planning Commission and the Architectural Board to approve all theater signs. He believed that the original intent of that section referred to a marquee sign. This pa.rticular sign, if considering the 1