My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/16/1986 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1986
>
1986 Architectural Review Board
>
04/16/1986 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:49 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 2:59:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1986
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/16/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />ARCHTTECTURAL BOARD OF-REVIEW <br />MINUTES - APRIL 16, 1986 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairwoman Case called the meeting to order at 4:55 p.m. <br />Present: M. Case, J. Britton, S. Ebin, and D. Pattison <br />Also Present: Building Commissioner S. Spino and Recording Secretary <br />B. Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />S. Ebin moved to approve the Minutes of March 19, 1986, seconded by M. Case, <br />and unanimously approved. <br />III. SIGNS: <br />1) George's Kitchen (Faith Sign Co.), 27350 Lorain Rd. <br />Signs (Building proposal heard December 18, 1985). <br />Sign on the b uilding will be neon letters applied to the stone wall <br />with a lexan cover over it; wire and transformer will not be visible. <br />They plan to change faces on existing pole sign to chocolate brown <br />letter on an ivory background; pole will be painted brown and not <br />lighted. Mr. Pattison does not like two different type letters on <br />one property. S. Ebin moved to approve the signs as submitted, secon- <br />ded by M. Case. Roll call on motion: Ebin, Case, and Britton, Yes. <br />Mr. Pattison, Nay. Mre Pattison explained that he did not like the <br />neon so low on.the building and does not like the combination of dif- <br />ferent type signs on one project and believes that a can type sign, <br />the same as the pole sign, should be repeated on the wall. The Board <br />agreed that this would be far better. <br />2) Lorain Road Auto Body (Impact Sign Co), 24532 Lorain Rd. <br />Pole sign (building proposal heard October 16, 1985 - Joe George) <br />Main part of pole sign (top) and one tenant insert sign were submitted. <br />Insert presented at meeting is different from original elevation: it <br />is bigger than proposed tenant signs, shape is not compatible with up- <br />per portion of sign; colors are not compatible. Original elevation <br />shows 3 tenant signs. 5' long, 12"'high and with radius ends. Board <br />questioned how many tenants will be in b uilding, this larger size <br />could keep other tenants from having sign. Insert must be submitted <br />at the next meeting, but Board agreed ta review main portion of sign . <br />at this time. Mre Pattison stated that sign is garish, too many <br />colors, and letters are outlined in different colors. Contractor <br />stated that pole is to be dark bronze. J. Britton moved to approve the <br />sign with the recommendations that the yellow be taken out and made <br />the same color as the background and that the side post be 7plack and <br />that any furture signage or tenant signs that would be mounted on <br />that particular sign be of the same shape as the Auto Body and Frame
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.