My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/26/1983 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1983
>
1983 Planning Commission
>
04/26/1983 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:34:27 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 5:19:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1983
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/26/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
N • - <br />??'• <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES - APRIL.:26, 1983 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Vice Chairman Burns called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. <br />Present: B. Gorris, J. Roberts, J. Wixted, J. Brown, and J., Burns. <br />Absent: T. Morgan <br />Also Present: Assistant Law Director J. Dubelko, Building Gommissioner <br />E. Gundy, Assistant City Engineer D. McDermott, Council- <br />man D. Woerpel and Recording Secretary B. Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />B. Gorris moved to approve the Minutes of April 12, 1983 as presented, <br />seconded by J. Wixted, and unanimously approved. <br />III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />(1) Signs: <br />(a), Springvale Country Club and No.Olmsted Golf Course Sign (Ord. <br />, 83-14), located in right-of-way at corner of Canterbury Rd. <br />and Butternut Ridge. Approved by Council (Ord. 83-14)fmon <br />March 1, 1983. Approved by Architectural Board of Review on <br />ApriT 20, 1983. <br />No representative present. Heard later in meeting. <br />(b) Casey's Restaurant, 27350 Lorain Rd. (Simon Sign Co.) <br />Pole sign.approved by Architectural Board on 12/22/82 <br />pole is now illuminated (original application did not <br />specify lighted pole) <br />Referred fxom BZD Committee for ARB and Planning Commission <br />. approval of pole. <br />Referred to Law Director by ARB on April 20, 1983. <br />No representative present.. Mr. Gundy advised the ARB motiorL <br />requesting a.legal opinion as to whether or not the illumin- <br />ated pole should be counted as part of the signage was ir- <br />relevant since the pole area had been included in the total <br />signage as required by ordinance because of the size of the <br />pole. At this time the illumination has been discontinued. <br />The issue now is if the Planning Commission want to approve <br />a lighted pole. The Commission agreed that this would start <br />a trend. J. Wixted moved to approve the Casey's pole sign <br />as originally submitted to.the Planning Commission, absent <br />the illuminated pole; that is, we disapprove the illuminated <br />pole, seconded by J. Roberts, and unanimously approved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.