Laserfiche WebLink
Tl.zese minutes are not off icial until approved at Planning Commission <br />Yieeting o'L SeT•tember 14, 1965. <br />MINUTES ar A MEETING OI' THE PI?.A`1\1NING COM[,IISSION <br />CIZ"y' OT NOR"i"Ii OUZSTED - AUGUST 3, 1965 <br />The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Ford at 8:15 F.M. <br />Present: Vice-Chairm.an Donald T. F'ord, and MemUe-rs Jack Esgar, lom <br />Tiabek? Norman T. 14usial and Walter Spalding. <br />Absent : Chairman James A. 1'rolcasy and Secretary An.thony T. LaPonza. <br />A1so Present: nicY2ard Labas, City Ln.gineero <br />The minutes of the previous meeting were read by acting secretary <br />Musial and corrected as f011ows: <br />Fage 5-- penultimate paragraph -- add the following "IL is to <br />bc noted tha-t based upon informazion provided to Nir. Sla 1d.ing that E?jclid <br />has about 90 acres of commercial property, Shalcer Heights about 104 acres <br />of conr??.ercial property, and North Olmsted currently has 854 acres oi <br />property zoned commercial. The current population f or the af orementioned <br />cities are 70,000 peoplE for Eu.clid, 40,000 people for Shalcer Heights, <br />and 251000 people in North 0lmstedo The projectedppopulation of Nort'n <br />0lmsted in thenear future is believed to be a figure on the order of <br />45,000 pe) p1e. <br />The minutes were then approved as corrected. <br />BP.LTTON RIDGE SU}3D1VI5IOIv N0 0 4 <br />I,'ir. Ford reported fo-r the commit-Lee. A11 changes recomrlended by the <br />I?;lanning Commission ancl Council have been made, Mr. Ford sees no reason <br />why we can't pass it tonight. It is to be noted 'Lhat B1ock B is not <br />usable by Biskind for three years. NIr. 5palding brough-L up the quit- <br />claim deed coricept tvi.th agplication to the pertinent property. ATro Esgar <br />and others felt, however, that this concept was not applicable here. Nlr. <br />Labas indicated that or. page 3 0f theplans that there is somc confusion <br />over the corporationline, however, there is a ques -Lion of wc:ose respon- <br />sibility it is. 1,4r. K.anareff stated that he wasn4t atter.tpting to estab- <br />lish a corpdr ation line in this instaitce. rir. LaUas stated that he is <br />satis=ied with the way it is currently presen-i.ecl. <br />It is -(-o Uenoted that Bloclc B has been changec3 to read 131oc1c B is hereby <br />reserved for street purposes for a period of three years to Ue.improved <br />by -the cteveloper if the city sha11 so requcst. " <br />NIr. 5palding moved thatthe plans as nresented Uy 1vIro Kanal eif be anProved. <br />Seconded by Fabek. YLEiS Spalding, Fabelc, Esgar, Ford, Nusia?. Nayes, <br />nonee <br /> RESUBllIVIS ION OF BEVERLY HILLS NO:. 4 <br /> 14r. Es?ar reported for the commit??ee. ?Ir. Lsgar rEflec?ted that ?ahen <br />merel <br />b <br />d t <br /> originally this plan was brought in, there e <br />y <br />o <br />was sta.gpos e <br /> a renumbering of the lot and the renaming of streets a Ilowever, whcn <br /> the proposed changes came in at the last meeting there were three lot <br /> changes addit-i:onally . IvIr. E?sgar indicated that 1ot numbers 167, 171