06/05/1968 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED --BOARD OF ZONING kPPEALS Regular Meeting held at City Ha12 -. Juxie 5, =1968. The meeting wa.s called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairraan Richard Nelson. Those present: Mrsm Eian, Mssrs. NeTson, Greene, Forcellini' Roberts Also p-resent: Mr. Gundy, Building Commissioner The minutes of 5/6/68 were appraved as written. l. Appellante Cleveland Paint & Color Co.9 26624 Lorain Roada Request to erect a sign in excess of pertnitted square footage. Request is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1225.02. Presents OFmer of Cleveland Paint & Color Co.' Jerxy :'chneidex of Brooks Electric Sign Co=any., Da,niel Matthews Mr.--Grundy eh-pla.ined that alI o£ the sign space for the building in which the Cleveland Paint & Color Co. will be Ioca.ted }a.as a.lready been used up by uther tenants of the building. Therefore a gariance must be granted if any sign whatsoever is used. It was pointed out that the bui].der af the stores should have divided the sign space up among the tenants so that this situation would not have come about. Members felt that it would be a hardship for the store to have no sign for identifica,tion and that the building would not Iook right with no sign above the store froilt. Mr. Matthewa stated that he had no objection to a sign being put up. Mr. Roberts moved to grant a varianee for a 31 X 321 s3gn; seconded by Mr. Greene and passed. 2. Appellant: Mrs. Fredric S. Hook, 4215 Bentley Drive. Request to erect a 61 fence around patio. Request is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Siaetion II51.04 which requirPs that a fence not excQed 41 in height. Present: Mr. & Mra. Hook, Mr. Lonc, Mr. Curran, Mr. Rabinson' Mr. & Mrs. Bruck, Mrs. Previt- Mr. Currsn submitted a petition signed b,p various neighbors ag+winst the proposed fence. MTBs Hook stated that most of the persons whose signatures appea.red thereon would not even be able to see the fence. Mr. Robinson and Mr. and Mrs. Bruck stated that they had no objeet3ons as did Mr. Lone. Mrs. Previte strated that she feeIs a fence such as this is unsightlg and that they downgrade the area. The fence wou1d be a redwood basketireave type situated to afford sone patio privacye Mre FQrcellini moved to grant a variance of 11 for a 51 fence to be installed around the patio; seconded by Pdrs. Eian and passed with Mr. Greene and Mr. Roberts voting no. 3. Appellant: Paul V. Bloser, 240II Fairlawn Drive. Request to erect a 61 fence at rear of lot. Renuest is in violation of Ordina.nce #62-332 Ser.tion .1151.04, i'ence not to exceed 41 in height. Present: Mr. Bloser Mr. Bloser explained that the Deerfield North park and pool area is directly behind his home a.nd is approxi.mately 31 higher than his Iot. He wishes to erect the fence for some measure of privacy. It would be a redwood basketweave type. Mr. Greene moved to gra.nt the varia.nce; seconded by Mr. Roberts and passed.