08/07/1968 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, , CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED - BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Reg?zlar Meeting held at Citsr Ha.ZZ --- Augta,st. 7' 1968_ The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairma.n Richard Nelson, Those present: Mssrs. Greene' Forcellini' Nelson., Mrs. Eia.n Also present: Mro Brady, BuiZding Department The minutes of the 7/18/68 meetiizg were a.pproved as written, 1. Appellant: 5nider Building Corporationo Request to erect a house at 6729 Cha.dbourne Drive with insufficient rear ya.rdo Request 3.;a in violation of Orc7inznce #62-33, Seetion 1163.0I which re- auires a 50E rear yard. Present: Nard Bennett of Snider Builders' Saul Biskind., Mr. Yanke' mr. Qsterland Mr. Bennett stated thatpthey had been unable to reach any agreement with Mr. Yanke fQr buying a portion of his Iand or for selling hun part of the property i-n question. Mr. Yanke sAid that he wa.s not in a position to buy the land at the present time and that he still did not- vish to sell any part of his 3ot. Mr. Biskind stated that they ha.d offered Mr. Yanke $3000 fox a portion of his Iot 33t X 76e in order to square off the Chadbesurne Drive Iot and to make it buildablee As it now stands, 15° of the proposed house would require a /.,/+t rear yard variance. It wa;s suggested that perhaps Mro Yanke might swap the portion of his Iand required fox the adjo9nu2g Iot on Cha.dbourne Drive. A11 improvements are in and paid for. It va.s painted out to Mr. Xaxyke that he would still have a laxge area of open lan.d but tha,t he would gain a 1ntildable lot that could be used in the f'uture if he so desired. Mr. Yar;ke stated that he would Iike to talk the idea over with his wife. Mr. Greene moved fi,o cantinue the case; seconded by Mrs. Eian and passed. ?. Appellant: Blenn Cook, /+709 Carsten Laneo Recluest to erect a 61 fence along rear property Iineo Request is i.n violation of Ordinanee #62-33, Sec-tion II51.0I, fence not to exceed 4' in height. Present: Mr, Coak Mr, Cook explained tha.t he wished to put up a rEdwdod basketweave fence to partiaZly hide frerm view a messy-ba.ck yard at the house to the rear of h3.s. His hame is in a new area adjacent to an oId section and there 3.s axs tulfiniShed playhouse and disorderly garage that he wishes to block froin view. He has taIked to his neighbar in the rear and he ha.s na objection. The fence ?Yould be 51 from the lot line because of a GEI easement. The lots on Silvexdale are higher than his and therefore he feels that a 6P fence would be necessaxyo The Board decided that they would Iike to inspect the area, l2r. Fearcellin.i moved to continue the case; seconded by Mr. Greene and passed, 30 Appellant: Wi11iam..H. Ring' 252/+6 Buttexnut Ridge Road, ;;Request to erect a 61 fence al.ong. sid& property Iine. " . Request is i.n violation of Ort3.inance #62-33, Section I151,0I, fence not to exceed 30" in height from buiZding Iine to street line and must be 50% openy f ence fron builcl3ng Iine to rear property line not to exceed 41 in height, Present: Mr. and_Mrs. King, Mr. Gahagan, Mr. BQUman, Mr. E1Iis, Mro and Mra. Belding