09/28/1971 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED9 OHIO PLANNING COMIISSION September 28, 1971 I. II. III IV V Ro1.1. Ca11 The meeting was caZled to order at 8:03 PaMo by Cha3.rman Donald Ledvinae Those present were Messrso Ledvina' J, Edward Brewer, Kurt Richards, James Ieonax°de Absent: Edward Byers, ftichard Nelson, and James Davis. Mr, Leonard moned to excnse the absence of the missing members9 seconded by Mr. Brewer and unanianously approved. Also present: Mr. Ransbury9 Assistant to City Engineer; Mr. Gundy, Building Comna.ssf.oner; Marge Nader, Secretary. Reading and Correct3.on of Minutes Mr. Ra.nsbury pointed out that under III (a) line two and three, the correct reading is theater B, C, D, and E, and approve buildings F. G and addita.on to Topps, MY°. Brewer moved to approve the minutes as corrected; seconded by Mr. Richards, and unanimously approved as corrected. Building Department Requests (a) Great 1Vorthern Office Buildin - Nlrm Gundy presented pl.ans for the Great Northern ffi.ce Bu3.lding, zihich wi11 hold management executive type officesm A variance was granted on 8/23/71 for hea.ght laLma.tations0 Mr. Hershman presented a picture of the buildingm A da.scassion was held regarding the parking facilit3.es o Mro I,eonard asked if there would be any change in the roadway. Mro Hershman stated that the drivetiray entering Great Northern w3,ll remaa.n the same. Mr. Leonard made a mot;ion to accept the Gx°eat Noxthern Ofii.ce Build3.ng0 Mr. Brewer seconded the motion and it was unanimously'passedm (b) Borden Burger - Mr. Gundy presented plans for a subd.ivision request on the corner of Westpark and I,orain. Mr. Griesenbrock represented BBFQ A discussion was he1d, Mr. Ieonard stated that there would be an extreme drainage pr°oblem and he wondered how it would bs handledo Mr. Ransbnry stated that since there are no adequate storm sewers on Lora9.n or Westpaxk, an underground retaa.nf.ng system wou7.d have to be used, Mr. I,eonard stated that it was originally set as3.de by the developer as a swale to drain the westerly portion of the 1ots, with an-easement to the city if the city had to ptzt in any necessary equipmentm Mr. Leonard made a motion to reject the subdiv3.sion on the basis of poor pl.anningm My°a Richards seconded the motion and it was unanimously agreed to re3ect the proposal because of poor planninge 01d Business 0lmsted Manor - The P1.anning Commission has not received any informat3.on as yeta New Developments and Subdivis3.ons (a) Adams' Subd3.vision - Mro Ra,nsbury and Mr, Adams presented plans for the subdivis3.on. Parcel number one is currently divided into two 1otsQ