My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/13/2014 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2014
>
2014 Landmarks Commission
>
10/13/2014 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:45:24 PM
Creation date
1/24/2019 6:46:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2014
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/13/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 2014 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Chairman Neville called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers and led the <br />Pledge of Allegiance. <br />Present: David Neville, Paul Schumann, Dale Thomas, Jim Dubelko, Jim Morse, Gretchen <br />Schuler <br />Absent: Tom Dubowslci, Don Rerlco, Duane Limpert <br />Staff: Planning & Development Director Kim Wenger <br />ItEVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Schumann moved, seconded by Mr. Morse to approve the Landmarks Commission minutes <br />of August 11, 2014 as written, which passed 6-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />CMS14-1750; North Olmsted Board of Education; 27191 Butternut Ridge Road <br />Proposal consists of a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of a house. <br />Michael McDade said it is the intent of the district to demolish the home at 27191 Butternut <br />Ridge Road as it is vacant and in poor condition. Demolition plans were distributed showing <br />green space once the home is removed. Should the bond issue pass, there may be future plans for <br />some development of the site. Mr. Neville said a few members viewed the home which had soine <br />items of interest but there isn't much historical significance to the home. Mr. Morse and Mr. <br />Schuinami agreed that it didn't appear the home had historical significance at least not, enough to <br />save it. Mr. Neville aslced what would be done once the home is demolished as the site is very <br />visible and neighboring homes should be buffered. Mr. McDade said as many trees as possible <br />will remain, the area of the home and driveway will be seeded with grass and maintained. The <br />abutting neighbors to the east will not be affected as the land will remain in a natural state for <br />now. Mr. Schuinann recused hiinself from voting as he abuts the site. He asked what the <br />contingency plan for the site was if the bond fails. Mr. McDade said the site would remain green <br />space. They would like to have the demolition completed prior to December. Mr. Schumann <br />asked if it was the intent of the district to return to Landmarks with a plan if the bond is approved <br />and Mr. McDade said yes. Mr. Neil Nemetz said it appeared the commission was just addressing <br />the demolition but when the annex was demolished there was quite a bit of dust and debris; he <br />asked what would be done to minimize dust. Mr. McDade said the home is a small frame home <br />so there won't be as much disturbance. Mr. Nemetz is concerned that there will be enough <br />buffering between his property and the sites parlcing lot. Mr. McDade said at this point he <br />doesn't have any plans pertaining to the development of the site or the amount of buffering. Mr. <br />Tim Harbison said their home was purchased due to the amount of greenspace behind the home <br />and while they are for updating the schools they would like to see as much of the area as possible <br />iā¢emain in a natural state. Mr. Dubelko asked that as the demolition takes place, is the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.