My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/14/2017 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2017
>
2017 Landmarks Commission
>
08/14/2017 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:45:52 PM
Creation date
1/24/2019 9:11:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2017
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
8/14/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br />CITY OF NO1tTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES FOR MEETING OF AUGUST 14, 2017 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mr. Neville called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm in Council Chambers. <br />Present: David Neville, Jim Morse, Duane Limpert, Sarah Egan-Reeves, Tom Dubowski, Paul <br />Schumann, Jim Dubelko <br />Absent: Gretchen Schuler <br />Staff: Planner James Aspery, Administrative Assistant Nicole Rambo-Ackerman <br />Mr. SchuYnann moved, seconded by Mr. Dubowski, to excuse the absence of Ms. Schuler, <br />motion passed 7-0. <br />REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Morse asked that the 25961 Kennedy Ridge Road discussion be separated from the Historic <br />Preservation Plan discussion. <br />Mr. Schumann moved, seconded by Mr. Morse, to approve the minutes of July 17, 2017 as <br />modified, motion passed 7-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />17-9330; Bruce Pearson; 26944 Butternut Ridge Road <br />Representatives: Bruce Pearson, owner; Mike Meeling and John Goch, Props Consulting; Mary <br />Ellen Hemann, Ward IV Councilwoman <br />Mr. Pearson stated that the siding on the house is deteriorating and needs to be replaced. He <br />would like to install Hardie board. This material was previously used for his garage. He would <br />try to match the overlap of the new siding so that it would be the same appearance as the existing <br />siding. He believed the Hardie board would not be noticeable from the street. The siding should <br />not need to be replaced for 15 years. Mr. Aspery reviewed the Standards of Rehabilitation from <br />the Department of the Interior and NOCO 165 requirements. Mr. Limpert asked if the Building <br />Department looked at the home to see if the materials were in disrepair, Mr. Aspery pointed out <br />that they do not look at the home until a permit is issu.,d. Mr. Morse asked if the original <br />materials would be left on the home. The applicant plans to remove the clapboard siding. Mr. <br />Morse believed the applicant was trying to keep the look of the original home. <br />Ms. Hemann said she has had multiple residents in her ward complain about being in the historic <br />district. She said the ordinance was not filed with the county when the district was established <br />and did not believe it was fair to new residents. She also did not think there was any value in the <br />historic district for what the district requires of the residents. She pointed out that a permit was <br />issued in 2013 for the siding on the garage without the commission's approval. Mr. Schumann <br />believed the issue at hand was that the original materials are available for reuse and the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.