Laserfiche WebLink
LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br />CITY OF NORTH OI.MSTED <br />MINUTES OF FEBRUAI2Y 12, 2018 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mr. Neville called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm in Council Chambers. <br />Present: David Neville, Jim Morse, Tom Dubowski, Sarah Egan-Reeves, Gretchen Schuler, Paul <br />Schumann (arrived after approval of minutes), Elizabeth Cardarelli, Jim Dubelko, Kevin <br />Kearney <br />Staff: Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, Planner James Aspery, Administrative Assistant <br />Nicole Rambo-Ackerman <br />REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Morse moved, seconded by Mr. Dubowski, to approve the Landmarks Commissaon <br />minutes of January 15, 2018, motion approved 8-0. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />2017 Year in Review <br />Mr. Aspery said the administration wanted to make the annual report document more engaging <br />to encapsulate what has happened throughout the city as well as within the commission. It would <br />be formatted like a yearbook or scrapbook. There was confusion about how the news section fit <br />together with the commission section. Mr. Dubelko suggested starting with the Landmarks <br />Commission section and put the "future history" towards the end, Mr. Neville agreed. Mr. <br />Schumann asked who the audience is intended to be, Mr. Aspery pointed out that it would be <br />shared through all of the city's digital channels. Mr. Neville liked that the commission's actions <br />were included in a potential widespread publication. Discussion about what the document should <br />be called. Mr. Dubelko asked if other commissions did an annual report similar to this. Mr. <br />Aspery believed the history was more relevant to this commission rather than others. Mr. <br />Schumann pointed out that the commission needs to have an annual report to keep their CLG <br />status. Mr. Neville asked if the other commissions had news that could be included, Mr. Aspery <br />pointed out the section that shows the events put on by the Arts Commission. Mr. Aspery wanted <br />each commission to have a unique report instead of trying to have a large report encompassing <br />all of the commissions. <br />Mr. Neville was concerned about the year in review satisfying the CLG requirement. Ms. Egan- <br />Reeves suggested another draft be reviewed before adoption. Mr. Morse and Ms. Egan-Reeves <br />volunteered to help reformat the report. Ms. Schuler thought that the document helps legitimize <br />the commission. Mr. Schumann asked Mr. O'Malley to verify that the report satisfies the CLG <br />requirement. Mr. Neville suggested that the future history be formatted like a newspaper. Mr. <br />Kearney agreed that the Landmarks Commission should be the first part of the document but <br />liked involving all of the commissions as well. <br />NEW BUSINESS