My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/24/2008 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2008
>
2008 Planning and Design Commission
>
11/24/2008 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:46:57 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 5:56:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2008
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/24/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PI,ANNING & I)ESIGN COMMISSION <br />CITY OF N012TH OLMS'I'ED <br />MINUTES FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2008 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mr. Laslco called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in Council Chambers and led the Pledge of <br />Allegiance. <br />Present: Jolui Laslco, Melissa Meredith, Jim Cotner, Angela Williamson, Greg Malone, Don <br />Rerlco <br />Absent: Ralph Bohlmann <br />Staff: Planning Director Kim Wenger, Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, City <br />Engineer Dan Collins, Clerk of Cominissions Donna Rote <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINiJTES <br />Mr. Laslco moved, seconded by Mrs. Meredith, to approve the Planning & Design Commission <br />ininutes of November 12, 2008 as written which was unanimously approved 6-0. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />CMS06-40: Sai-ton Fark Senior LivinLy; PPN 233-07-009 (Barton Road <br />Mr. Laslco said the proposal consisted of a development plan for a senior living facility which <br />had been on hold since November 28, 2007; therefore the proposal was doclceted to bring finality <br />to the matter. No representatives of the proposal were present. Ms. Wenger said the application <br />was filed in 2006, and the proposal was tabled in November 2007, where the Commission <br />requested plan changes and additional information. No action has since been talcen by the <br />applicant to return to the Commission. The applicant was notified the matter would be addressed <br />and requested to continue to be tabled until a future date. She recorrunended the commission <br />talce action on the inactive case and require a new application in the future. <br />Mr. O'Malley clarified that the applicant was notified of the meeting and chose not to be present. <br />Their request to be tabled is an indication that they believe their retroactive application under a <br />previous zoning classification would apply forever, which is entirely inappropriate. The initial <br />application may have been under the old zoning (multi family) and if they had vigorously <br />pursued the application it may have been able to avoid the changes of the zoning code. However <br />no action has been talcen for a year. Therefore it is appropriate for the commission to apply the <br />cunent zoning laws to the application which does not permit the proposed development. The <br />commission could deny the application based on the fact no action has been taken since the last <br />November meeting as well as the current zoning laws which does not allow multi family in the <br />district. He recommended the commission talce action on the request to be tabled first then <br />proceed to address the merits of the plan. <br />Mr. Laslco said although the applicant requested to be tabled the e-mail submitted was deficient <br />and the applicant is not present nor have plans or documents been submitted addressing the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.