02/07/2008 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r BOARD OF ZONIlVG APPEALS CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 07, 2008 ROLL CAI,L Chairwoman Diver called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm in Council Chambers. Present: Maureen Diver, Jennifer Rudolph, Robert Menser, Nancy Sergi and Laura Bellido. Staff: Law Director Jim Dubelko, Planning Director Kimberly Wenger, Building Commissioner David Conway and Clerlc of Commissions Donna Rote. Chairwoman Diver reviewed that there were 4 cases requesting 1 special permit and 12 area variances. She fiirther advised that each board member viewed the premises involved for each case. Three votes are required for approval and in addition, each case will be judged on the physical situation peculiar to itself, so that in no way is a judgment rendered considered to be a general policy judgment affecting properties and like situations elsewhere. The board will address each of the seven standards when reviewing each case and every applicant was asked to address all seven standards in their presentation. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES Mr. Menser moved seconded by Mrs. Sergi, to approve the December 06, 2007 Board of Zoning Appeals minutes as written, which was approved 5-0. RESIDENTIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS: Jeryl Sradesca; 24885 Antler l3rive (Ward 2) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a front porch. The following variances are requested: 1. A 7 foot front yard setback variance for a residence too close to the right of way (code requires 50', applicant shows 43'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.06 (a)). Note: BZA tabled 12/06/07. Mrs. Bradesca the owner and Mr. Strootbeclc the Contractor each came forward to be sworn in and address the board. Mrs. Bradesca said her husband suffered a stroke and is now disabled. She would like to allow him access to the outdoors. The original porch was dilapidating so the replacement porch will be a little larger and covered. The size chosen is to accommodate the wheelchairs maneuvering ability. An electronic lift is used in the garage for her husband to enter and exit the car and home. The property value will be increased both for her and the neighbors with the improveinent and Governmental services would not be affected. Mr. Conway advised that the porch was the minimal size allowed for a wheelchair and he did not believe the variance was substantial. Mr. Dubelko advised that disabilities should be factored when addressing variances. Mr. Menser voiced he did not feel the porch would be detrimental to the neighborhood. Mrs. Bellido felt that the home would be improved as well as the neighborhood. Ms. Rudolph felt the porch was a welcoming addition as it promotes neighbors ability to get to lcnow each other. Mrs. Sergi said the neighborhood would be altered but in a positive manor and may promote additional neighborhood improvements. The spirit and intent of the code would be upheld granting the variance for the porch and Governmental services