My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/03/2009 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2009
>
2009 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
12/03/2009 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:07 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 6:17:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2009
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/3/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1% <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MEETING MINUTES OF IyECEMBER 3, 2009 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Mrs. Diver called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. in Council Chambers. ' <br />Present: Maureen Diver, Nancy Sergi, Jennifer Rudolph, Laura Bellido, Alfredo Lopez (arrived <br />at 7:45 p.m.) <br />Staff: Assistant Law Director Bryan O'Malley, Building Commissioner Dale Mitchell, Clerlc <br />of Commissions Donna Rote REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mrs. Bellido, to approve the November 12, 2009 Board of <br />Zoning Appeals minutes which was unanimously approved 4-0. <br />RESIDENTIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />Jerry Litchney & Diane Galdaez; 7148 Barton Road <br />Request for variance. Proposal consists of a shed and the following variance is requested: <br />An 80 square foot variance for storage shed larger than allowed, code permits 200 sq ft, applicant <br />shows 280 sq ft which is in violation of 1135.02(d)(1). Note: Over 200 sq ft requires a masonry <br />or concrete foundation. <br />Mr. Litchney was sworn in and said the variance was needed for a 14'x 20' storage shed which <br />he needs to store his vehicles and lawn equipment. He read a letter indicating why he was <br />requesting the variance (see attached). Olmsted Township which borders his property doesn't <br />have the same property standards as North Olmsted which is evident. The placement of the shed <br />will help bloclc the view of the neighboring unkempt yards. Mrs. Sergi questioned the ribbons <br />around the owner's trees and he said they were used to let the contractors lcnow which trees to <br />save. He also noted the abutting neighbor cleared trees on his vacant lot and just left them to rot. <br />Mrs. Diver aslced if the building commissioner could address the issue on the vacant lot and Mr. <br />Mitchell said it would be loolced into. <br />Mr. Mitchell does not recommend approval of the variance, which is significant. The 1ot is <br />29,392 square feet which is allowed a 200 sq ft shed. Mr. Litchney is asking for a shed which <br />requires the lot to be over an acre. He is requesting 1.4 times more than he is allowed by code. <br />The addresses noted in Mr. Litchney's letter have attached 2 car garages as well as 1%z car <br />detached-garages which are allowed by code if both garages do not exceed. 750 sq ft combined <br />and a standard 2-car garage 22'x22' and 1%z car garage 22'x12' averages 748 sq ft which is <br />allowed Uy code. Mr. Litchney asked if he would be allowed to build a detached garage without <br />a variance and Mr. Mitchell said yes as long as the combined total square footage does not <br />exceed 750 sq ft and if a foundation, downspouts and driveway are installed in accordance to <br />code. Ms. Rudolph pointed out that the only difference from building a detached garage was <br />installing a driveway as the accessory structure requires a foundation and downspouts. Mr. <br />O'Malley noted that the section of the code which stipulates the size of sheds allowed was just
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.