Laserfiche WebLink
. 1 <br />updated in 2007 so it was relatively new and was established through talcing into consideration <br />the various lot sizes throughout North Olmsted. <br />Mr. Lopez said he agreed with Mr. Mitchell's assessment that the request was substantial. A <br />shed can be constructed to code which would provide storage. Mrs. Sergi agreed and although <br />the lot is large it is narrow and the size does not warrant such a large shed. Ms. Rudolph said <br />comparing 80 sq ft to the maximum size of 200 sq ft is substantial however comparing the fact <br />that if the owner wanted he could erect a 1%z car detached garage as long as the total square <br />footage of both don't exceed 750 sq ft seems inherently wrong. Mrs. Bellido said the request is <br />substantial regardless of how deep the yard is. Mrs. Diver said the applicant mentioned a third <br />vehicle and motorcycle which neither can be stored in a shed as there is no driveway. <br />Ms. ltudolph moved, seconded by Mr. Lopez, to grant Jerry Litchney & Diane Galdaez of <br />7148 Barton Road an 80 square foot variance for storage shed larger than allowed; code <br />permits 200 sq ft, applicant shows 280 sq ft which is in violation of 1135.02(d)(1). Roll call: <br />Diver, Sergi, Lopez, Bellido - no, Rudolph - yes; variance denied 1-4. <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />BZA Rules and Re2ulations <br />Mr. O'Malley noted that other boards say the Pledge of Allegiance at the start of each rneeting <br />and suggested the board could also have a caucus prior to their meetings as needed both of which <br />could be added to the rules. Board members said they would like both suggestions added to the <br />ililes. <br />2010 Meetin2 Calendar <br />Mrs. Diver noted she would be absent from the February meeting. Mrs. Sergi aslced if the city <br />codes had any wording which would prohibit the board from not having a meeting in February <br />and Mr. O'Malley said that the code stipulates that the Board of Zoning Appeals will meet once <br />a month. A brief discussion regarding possibly moving the meeting time to 7:00 pm took place <br />however 7:30 was the preferred meeting tiine. Board members agreed the proposed calendar for <br />2010 was acceptable. <br />ADJOURIVMENT <br />With no further business the meeting adjourned at 8 <br />r , <br />?._ <br />\ '?L <br />Maureen Diver, Chair <br />15 p.m. <br />{ <br />D a Rote, Clerk of Commissioris <br />Approved: <br />2