06/17/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?.? CITY OF NORTH OLMST'ED "TOGETBER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE! " ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MINUTES - JUNE 17, 1998 1. ROLL CALL: Chairman Zergott called the meeting to order at 5:36 P.M. Present: M. Yager and B. Zergott. Absent: T. Liggett Also Present: Assistant Building Commissioner RyYnarczyk and Clerk of Commissions Cornish. II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: M. Yager moved to approve.the minutes of Apri122, 1998, May 20, 1998 and June 3, 1998. The motion was seconded by B. Zergott and unanimously approved. - III. SIGNS: There was a presentation for Great Northern Shopping Center which was tabled until later in the meeting. ' N. ? OLD BUSINESS: No items. V. NEW BUSINESS: 1) Retail Today (Former Krogars Supermarket) located on the East side of Clague Road, South adjacent to proposed CVS Pharmacv: Proposal consists of Renovations & Reduction of existing structure. Note: Existing structure does not comply with the current setback requirements. Refened by planning commission May 26, 1998. Mr. Petros and Mr. Webber, architects made the presentation. The plan included demolishing a portion of the existing building, but retaining a portion in the rear 8,736 (84X104) square feet ofthe existiug building. Mr. Petros verified the floor along with the back and part of the side wall will remain intact, but the remainder of the building will be demolished. He noted everything else on the site will remain as originally approved by city council. The materials to be utilized will match the C. V. S. bu.ilding. Mr. Zergott questioned if the developer has moved the dumpster per the request of planuing commission. Mr. Petros agreed the dumpster will be rotated 180 degrees per the request of plaiuuug commission. In addition to rotating the dumpster 180 degrees, Mr. Yager suggested moving it back to be in line with the drive-thru canopy area. Mr. Petros agreed to comply with Mr. Yager's suggestion. A front elevation sketch was presented and Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk requested to retain a copy for the file. Mr. Yager requested clarification on what type of brick material is utilized on the existing bu.ilding. Mr. Petros advised the existing bu.ilding is constructed out of the 1/2 inch vaneer. Mr. Yager pointed out something will have to be done with the back side of the bu.ilding to prevent any moisture from seeping through and topping the vaneer. He questioned if a cost analysis has been conducted comparing the vaneer to a whitened brick. Although the cost of a whitened brick is almost twice as much as the vaneer, Mr. Yager noted the whitened brick is far easier to maintain. Councilman McKay advised the developer to contact Councilman Gareau regarding this project as he was very unhappy that the developer is requesting to leave the wall. The original presentation called for the demolition of the entire building. Mr. Petms agreed to get in contact with Mr. Gareau regarding the request and noted there is plenty of time since council will not reconvine until the month of August. Mr. Yager questioned if maintaining $s6-S52ti