My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/26/1998 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1998
>
1998 Architectural Review Board
>
03/26/1998 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:51 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1998
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/26/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.A <br />Vf <br />CITY OF NORT'H OLMSTED <br />ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD <br />SPECIAL MEETINCY <br />MINUTES - MARCH 26, 1998 <br />CONFERENCE ROOM - 8:30 A.M. <br />1. ROLL CAI.,L: <br />Present: B. Zergott; M. Yager; and T. Liggett. <br />Also present: Clerk o£ Commissions Cornish. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NIINUTES: <br />III. SIGNS: <br />IV. OLD BUSINESS: <br />1) Pronosed Candlewood Hotel, located on the south side of Country Club Blvd., east-adjacent <br />to the newly constructed Homestead Village Hotel. Proposal to construct Hotel. Heard by <br />planniug commission March 10, 1998. Heard by architectural review board March 18, 1998. <br />Mr. Nemecek advised since the last meeting a compromise has been submitted. Mr. Yager stated <br />he reviewed the partiaY elevations and had the following comments: "NVe would approve these <br />elevations if tliey were all brick. Tlie notes on the attached sheets are a compromise at best and <br />might be rejected by city council, although our architectural review board would compromise for <br />the noted documents. You decide what the potential delay in approvals would mean to your <br />project." Mr. Nemecek stated tlie signage issue has not been discussed in detail at the <br />arclutectural review board level and he wondered if that can be presented first. Mr. Yager <br />requested that the discussion be restricted to the build.ing only since a special meeting was called <br />for this purpose and the members are on a time restraint. Mr. Nemecek stated he agreed to a <br />compromise. He would like the arch ways to remain the dryvit material as the gables themselves <br />would have to,become steal if brick is requ.ired in the gable area. He wondered if the brick in the <br />gables could be placed elsewhere, such as constructing tlie gazebo in brick. Mr. Yager wondered <br />if there were new blue print's showing these revised elevations. Mr. Nemecek explained there <br />was not enough time to do another blue print. Mr. Melby reiterated the problem vvitla malcing the <br />gables brick Ys this has to become steel and all the support systems will also have to be steel. Mr. <br />Liggett approved of the elevation. Mr. Yager was unsure what the elevation loolced like as tlie <br />presentation was a fax and the submittal depicts the original building of all Dryvit. He noted this <br />special meeting was called to resolve what the elevations should look like, yet there is no <br />resolution to an elevation that the board can review. Mr. Nemecek stated the board should know <br />what a four story, all brick stair tower will look like. Mr. Yager maintained he did not know what <br />it would look like as he does not lmow how far it will wrap around, the plan relationslup to the <br />elevations, etc. Mr. Liggett questioned if the developer can show a plan that the board can look <br />at and see where tlie brick is going. He quesrioned if tlie stau tower will return to a perpendicular <br />wall or if it is all flush. Mr. Nemecek confirmed tlie return would be into tlie corner. Mr. Liggett <br />stated the floor plan should clear up the returns. Mr. Yager pointed out the floor plan is not
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.