Laserfiche WebLink
t ,- <br />- - , - CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!" <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br />MINUTES - OCTOBER 1, 1998 <br />@ 7:30 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />"DUE TO A TECHNICAL ERROR NO NIINUTES WERE RECORDED <br />THE MINUTES ARE SUMMARIZED FROM THE ASSISTANT CLERKS NOTES" <br />1. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Gomersall called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />PRESENT: R. Gomersall, W. Kremzar, J. Konold, T. Koberna, and J. Maloney. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Law Director Gareau, Building Commissioner Conway, and Assistant <br />Clerk of Commissions Rote. <br />II. DISPOSITION OF MIlVUTES: J. Konold moved to approve the September 10,1998 <br />minutes. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. <br />Chairman Gomersall advised that each case would be judged on the physical situation peculiar to <br />itselt so that in no way is a judgment rendered considered to be a general policy judgment affecting <br />properties and like situations elsewhere. <br />1) Star Bank: 4700 Great Northern Blvd.: , <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal for sign package. <br />Request the following variance(s): <br />1). A 32 Square foot variance for a business building. <br />Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.11 (c). <br />Note: Board of zoning appeals granted a building sign variances on 28 Feb., 1996, and 7 May, <br />1998. Went before Board of zoning appeals meeting dated 9/10/98 and was tabled until Giant <br />Eagle's signage is addressed. <br />Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. <br />Jorbach, and Mr. Petter. Mr. Gomersall suggested the board still doesn't know what Giant Eagle <br />will do, their letters do not address what was asked of them. Mr. 7orbach indicated that they were <br />not affiliated with Giant Eagle. Mr. Gomersall indicated he would like to see the size of the new sign <br />to be no more then 24 square feet. Mr. Jorbach submitted a new drawing for a sign that would be <br />24 square feet and indicated they could use the new size. Mr. Gomersall indicated if you,go with the <br />24 square feet sign we can give you the variance you need, but if you don't then the 32 square feet <br />will be denied. W. Petter asked is a variance even needed for the 24 square foot sign. Mr. Conway <br />suggested Star Bank would need a 24 square foot variance because the total square footage for the <br />building will be over what is allowed. Law Director Gareau reviewed the two letters submitted by <br />Giant Eagle. It is suggested that Giant Eagle is in favor of the Star Bank sign request, and they have <br />suggested they have no plans to modify their sign that is there now. W. Gareau suggested if they <br />come back complaining they need a bigger sign because of what is granted to Star Bank you would <br />have a right to just turn them down, because you tried to address the matter before it could become <br />a problem. They have made no attempt to speak up on their own behalf. W. Petter indicated a 24' <br />square foot sign- would be used if the variance was granted.