My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/17/2000 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2000
>
2000 Architectural Review Board
>
05/17/2000 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:28 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:40:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2000
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/17/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD <br />1VIINUTES - MAY 17, 2000 <br />CONFERENCE ROOM - 5:30 P.M. <br />1. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman, Zergott called the meeting to order at 5:30pm. <br />PRESENT: Chairman, B. Zergott, Board members, T. Liggett, K. Schulz and M. Yager. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Building Commissioner, T. Rymarczyk, and Clerk of <br />Commissions, D. Rote. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MIl%TUTES: The Architectural Review Board <br />minutes for Maxch 22, 2000 have been submitted for approval. <br />B. Zergott motioned to approve the minutes of March 22, 2000, as amended: Ms. Schulz <br />name does not have a"t" in it and also on page 4 Ms. Schulz indicated that it was Mrs. <br />Schmidt that responded to a question, not herself. The motion was seconded by Ms. Schulz <br />and unanimously approved. <br />III. SIGNS: <br />N. OLD BUSINES5: <br />V. NEW BUSINESS: <br />1. Duke-V'lWeeks Realitv' Location is south side of AL Moen Drive PP# 236-11-009,011,018 & <br />236-12-010: Proposal consists of erecting a building on the front southwest side of Moen <br />Drive. Note: The Planning Commission addressed this proposal at the May 9, 2000 meeting. <br />Mr. Ford, from Ford & Berry Architects, and Mr. Hall came forward to review the proposal. <br />Mr. Ford indicated that he has worked with Duke-Weeks in Columbus with building their <br />parent buildings. Mr. Ford indicated that the picture of the building that was submitted is an <br />actual photograph of what the building would look like when completed. The building <br />would be all brick 3 story with some cast stone accent bands around the building. There is a <br />large center arch with a suspended canopy over the entryway. Mr. Ford indicated this serves <br />two purposes, one, there would be a place when outside the door to open an umbrella before <br />going into the rain, and two, the scale is brought down so a person is not intimidated by the <br />three story arch. He indicated it would be a hand laid brick and not a panelized brick system. <br />The color resembles limestone. Mr. Ford indicated there would be Spandrel glass used <br />which is complementary to the brick. There would also be sand-molded brick. They will be <br />using standard brick and there would also be shaded glass in which the mullions would be <br />champagne. Mr. Ford indicated the building would be traditionally organized being <br />symmetrical on the axis. Mr. Yager questioned what the lighting program would be on the <br />site and on the building. Mr. Ford reviewed that there would be lighting in the arch at night, <br />which washes down the glass. He indicated there could be lighting placed on the top of the <br />canopy and has them shine up. Unfortunately, there would be tenants on the second floor in <br />a conference room where the lighting would be distracting. Mr. Ford reiterated that there <br />would only be lighting in the arch. Mr. Ha11 indicated that there would be lights in the <br />parking lot that are similar to what is seen at the Moen building presently. He indicated that <br />the fixtures would be pole mounted throughout the parking lot. Mr. Hall also indicated that
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.