11/01/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- CITI' OI+' NORTH OI,IVISTED "TOGETHER WE CAN NdAKE A I)IFFERENCE" BOE4RD OF ZONING APPEAb,S M1NgTTES -NOVEMBElZ 1, 2001 7:30P10'I I. ROLL CALL: Chairman, Maloney called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT: Chairman, J. Maloney, Board members, W. Kremzar, J. Konold, T. Koberna and T. Kelly. ALSO PRESENT: Law Director, M. Ga.reau, Asst. Building Commissioner, T. Rymarczyk and Asst. Clerk of Commissions, S. Solomon. H. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: The Board of Zoning Appeals minutes of October 4, 2001 been submitted for approval. J. Konold motioned to approve the Board of Zoning Appeals minutes dated October 4, 2001 as written. The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and was unanimously approved. Approved. There are 6 cases requesting 9 variances. J. Maloney advised that each board member had viewed the premises involved for each case. Three votes are required for approval. In addition each case will be judged on the physical situation peculiar to itself, so that in no way is a judgment rendered considered to be a general policy judgment affecting properties and like situations elsewhere. III. BUII,DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 1. Michael Imperatore; 3974 Winton Park Dr. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of building a shed. The following variance is requested: 1) A 14 sq. ft. variance for exceeding 2% of rear yard (code pernuts 82 sq. ft., applicant shows 96 sq. ft.), section (1135.02 D-1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-l. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to Amy Imperatore, the owner, who came forward to review the request. Mr. Maloney indicated that she needed a 14 sq. ft. variance for her shed. N1rs. Imperatore replied that he was correct. Mr. Maloney commented that they viewed the premises and they noticed the shed on the north side of the yard, and questioned if they were going to put a second shed in. Mrs. Imperatore replied no, just the shed that is there now: Mr. Kremzar indicated that the drawing shows it on the south side of the yard. Mrs. Imperatore indicated that they did move it. The building inspector came out and told them it was too close to the rear line, so it is on the north side of the yard right now. Mr. Kremzar questioned why the drawing showed it on the south side. IV1rs. Imperatore replied that the inspector must not have made a new drawing, because he came out and looked at it after they moved it and he said it was within the code. Mr. Konold questioned when this was. Mrs. Imperatore replied about a week and a half ago. He came out originally and told them it was in violation of the code, they had it moved, and then he came out again and said that it was O.K. Mr. Maloney inquired if anyone had any further questions. Nobody did. N1r. Maloney called for a motion. W. Kremzar motioned to grant Michael Imperatore of 3974 Winton Park Dr. the request for variance 1123,12. Which consists of a shed and that the following variance be granted: A 14 sq. ft. variance for exceeding 2% of rear yard (code permits 82 sq. ft., applicant shows 96 sq. ft.), section (1135.02 D-1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-1. The motion was seconded by J. Konold and was unanimously approved. Granted 11/1/01.