04/18/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED "TOGETHEIt WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" ARCHIT'EC'TURAL REVrEW BOARI) MINUTES - APRII.18, 2001 CONFERENCE ROOlVI 5:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL: Chairman, Zergott called the meeting to order at 5:3 Opm. PRESENT: Chairman, Zergott, Board members; J. Nader, M. Yager, K. Schulz, and T. Liggett. ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Building Commissioner, T. Rymarczyk and Clerk of Commissions, D. Rote. II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF M1rTUTES: The Architectural Review Board minutes for March 21, 2001 and Special meeting of April 4, 2001 have been submitted for approval. K. Schulz motioned to approve the March 21, 2001 minutes once the spelling of Mrs. Nader's name is corrected. The motion was seconded by B. Zergott roll call on the motion K. Schulz, J. Nader, T. Liggett and B. Zergott, yes, M. Yager; abstain. Motion Carried. Mr. Zergott indicated that the minutes of Apri14, 2001 will be reviewed at the next regularly scheduled meeting. III. SIGNS: IV. OLD BUSINESS: V. NEW BUSINESS: Braulio Roldan (Roldan's Car Service); 23055 Lorain Rd. Proposal consists of adding a Sunroom to the existing structure. Note: Planning Commission heard this proposal 4/25/00 & 3/27/01. Board of Zoning Appeals granted variances 5/4/00. Chairman Zergott called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Mr. Mertes, the contractor came forward to review the proposal. Mr. Mertes indicated that the proposal is for an addition to the existing building. The addition will be split-face block and painted white to match the rest of the building. The frames of the windows and sliding glass door will be white aluminum. Mr. Yager questioned what roofing material would be used. ` Mr. Mertes commented that the roof will match the existing roof, black 3 tab asphalt shingle. Mr. Yager questioned if Mr. Mertes had pictures of the existing building. Mr. 4'ager inquired were the addition would start and end on the back of the building. Mr. Mertes reviewed that the electric pole would be moved to accommodate the addition. Mr. Yager questioned what would be removed and what would stay along the back wall. 1VIr. Mertes suggested that the above ground storage tank and_the gas meter would remain. Mr. Liggett questioned if the addition could have as many windows as shown under the State Code. The addition is only 20 feet from the property line and according to the OBBC there is a certain fire rating that must be followed for the rear wall. He does not believe there can be that many openings in the addition. Mr. Mertes suggested that there was not a building at the end of the property line. Mr. Liggett commented that it did not matter, according to the Ohio Basic Building Codes there is a specific fire rating that must be followed. He believed that the addition would not be allowed to exceed 50% opening on a lhour rating which this exceeds. He advised Mr. Mertes to look into whether or not the addition met the OBBC. 1VIr. Yager remarked that he would guess that there is no architect involved with the project the way the blue prints look. Mr. Mertes indicated that was correct. W. Yager suggested that the applicant would then have to rely on the