Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!" <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES - OC'I'OBER 22, 2002 <br />IN COUNCII. CHAMBERS <br />7:30 P.M. <br />I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Koeth called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Chairman R. Koeth, and board members, J. Lasko, W. Spalding, C. Allan, <br />T. Hreha, and K. O'Rourke <br />ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Law Director, B. O'Malley, Building Commissioner, D. Conway, <br />Assistant City Engineer, L. Griffith, and Assistant Clerk of Commissions, A. Kilbane <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: The Planning Commission minutes dated September <br />24, 2002 for the work session, and October 8, 2002, have been submitted for approval. <br />Mr. Lasko indicated he would like the minutes from the September 24t', 2002 work session to reflect <br />that the absence of Mr. Spalding and Mr. Hreha was excused. <br />R. Koeth made a motion to approve the September 24th minutes as amended. The motion was seconded <br />by J. Lasko and unanimously approved. <br />R. Koeth made a motion to approve the October 8t' minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by <br />W. Spalding and unanimously approved. <br />III. BUII,DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />1. Rockwvnd SubdivisionColumbia Rd. between Brookpark and Countrv Club Blvd.: <br />Proposal consists of new subdivision consisting of 31 units. Note: Variances may be required pending <br />Planning Commission's ruling. Note: Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on 9/10/02 and <br />referred the proposal to the Architectural Review Board on 9/24/02. Architectural Review Board <br />approved this proposa.l 10-16-02 <br />Chairman Koeth reviewed the proposal. He then indicated he would like to change the way they <br />normally proceed in meetings if the commissioners are in agreement. He would like to get feedback <br />from the building department, the engineering department, and from the law department first, and then <br />if anyone on the board has any questions, he or she can ask the directors. Once that stage is completed, <br />he will ask Mr. Corsi, the representative from Greystone Realty, to come forward to give his <br />presentation and to answer any questions the board may have. The board will then take any questions <br />from the audience. Mr. Koeth asked Mr. Conway for his feedback on the proposal. Mr. Conway <br />mentioned a memo sent out July 15th, 2002 which listed the variances that are required. He said he will <br />update that list because there was a new site plan submitted. The first variance deals with the building <br />setback from the streets. The closest they could find at any given point is 4 feet. The code requires 25 <br />feet from a street and/or sidewalk to the beginning of a structure. It should be noted that the driveways <br />are to the rear of the structure. This is a slightly unique development compared to some of the clusters <br />they have already developed in the city in that they are putting the access to the back. The second issue <br />is a rear setback for the development where it abuts the existing property to the east. Some of that <br />property is zoned single family, and some is zoned multi-family. They are up there 15 feet off the lot <br />line now as it exists, instead of the 50 feet, requiring a variance of 35 feet. None of the proposed floor <br />plans meet the minimum requirements for square footage. Our code requires 900 square feet on the <br />first floor for a two story, and 1,150 feet on the first floor for a story and a half, with 50% of that, or <br />575 square feet, on the second floor. He does not think those floor plans have changed other than one <br />model which is the Columbia lV, which was slightly reduced from 771 to 741. He said they do have