Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD <br />MINUTES - JULY 16, 2003 <br />CONFERENCE ROOM <br />5:30 P.M. <br />1. ROLL CALL: Vice Chairman Yager called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. <br />PRESENT: K. Schulz, M. Yager, and J. Nader <br />ABSENT: B. Zergott <br />ALSO PRESENT: Building Commissioner D. Conway, Assistant Clerk of Commissions A. Kilbane <br />H. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />The Architectural Review Board minutes dated June 18, 2003 have been submitted for approval. <br />J. Nader made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by M. <br />Yager. Roll call on the motion: J. Nader and M. Yager - Yes, and K. Schulz - Abstain. <br />III. SIGNS: <br />N. OLD BUSINESS: <br />l. Remington College; 2635 Great Northern Shopping Center: <br />Proposal consists of new exterior iinprovements, new masonry covered entrance to the existing Top's <br />building to accommodate a post secondary school. Note: Planning Commission granted a conditional use <br />permit 1/14/03 and approved the proposal 5/27/03. Architectural Review Board tabled the plans 6/18/03. <br />Variance request was tabled 6/5/03 by the Board of Zoning Appeals. <br />Apvlicant's Presentation <br />Mr. Strelau of ADA Architects came forward to address the board. He indicated that since their last <br />appearance before the board, they have revised their landscaping scheme and they have brought the site <br />lighting package. They have an application with the Board of Zoning Appeals that is still pending. They <br />will appear before that board on August 7 for variances on the site lighting, specifically foot candle levels <br />and set back requirements. Mr. Conway confirmed that information. Mr. Strelau said they originally <br />planned no changes on the site lighting but they are now proposing to go with a new scheme. They will <br />remove existing light poles and fixtures. He pointed out the poles on the site plan. He said there is some <br />under-canopy lighting and a few fixtures on the canopy itsel£ They have internally illuminated signage for <br />the words "Remington College", and some lighting for the flagpole. The type of fixture in the parking field <br />itself is similar to the style currently at the strip center. It is a shoebox type, standard fixture, which will <br />blend in well at Great Northern. They are on 30-foot poles, which is why they need the variance. The <br />under-canopy lights are just the shoebox, recessed type light that will be flush with the canopy. The lights <br />for the sign and flagpole are fixtures that have shielding on them to direct light toward the sign and <br />flagpole. They will use a similar light by the emergency egress doors that mount horizontally and shine <br />down. The colors are dark bronze on the poles, which matches Great Northern. On the building mounted <br />fixtures, they are proposing a light gray finish. <br />Board Ouestions and Comrrients: <br />Mr. Yager asked if the SA fixture on the upper left of the plan will go on the canopy. Mr. Strelau said it <br />would actually be the building fagade. Mr. Yager asked if the fixtures for the flag will be mounted. He <br />asked if they are sure the light will hit the flag. Mr. Strelau said they are proposing shrouds on it because <br />they don't want it to do anything other than hit the flag. Mr. Yager said he wouldn't think they would want <br />to see it on the roof of the canopy either. He commented that they have wall washers and there are three <br />going up the wall yet they have an illuminated sign. He said he thinks they would fight with each other. <br />Mr. Strelau said the "R" is illuminated and the Remington College and the verbiage underneath are post <br />letters and not illuminated at all. He asked for clarification that the board wants him to look at the flag <br />fixtures. Mr. Yager said they probably don't want to see those fixtures sitting on the canopy. There are a <br />lot of different fixtures that can showcase the flag without focusing on the wall. Ms. Schulz asked if they <br />could mount something on the roof. Mr. Strelau said perhaps that is a better place to put it. Mr. Yager <br />mentioned that the applicant was asked to look at proportions and the height of the entry area. Mr. Strelau