Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHEla WE CAIV MAI{E A DIFFERENCE!" <br />I.ANDMARKS COMMISSION <br />10'IINiTTES - MAY 12, 2003 <br />IN OLI) TOWN HALL <br />7:00 P.M. <br />1. ROLL CALL: Vice Chairman Lord called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br />PRESENT: B. Lord, T. Dubowski, L. VanAuken, and K. O'Rourke <br />ABSENT: J. Lang, P. Barker, M. Davis, G. Corell, and J. Dailey <br />ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Law Director B. O'Malley <br />II. REVIIEW AND CORREC'I'ION OF MINUTES: The Landmarks Commission minutes from the <br />April 14, 2003 meeting have been submitted for approval. <br />III. NEW BUSINESS: Scott Stettin 27370 Butternut Ridge Rd. - Resident proposes to construct a deck. <br />Mrs. Lord explained the board does not have a quorum so therefore they cannot conduct official <br />business, but they can talk with Mr. Stettin and try to expedite matters as it is not his fault there is not a <br />quorum. Mrs. Lord pointed out that Mr. Stettin lives in the house right next to the library property on <br />Butternut. Mr. Stettin said he would like to put a deck on the back of the house. Mr. Stettin said it will <br />look out over the yard, which is quite wooded. He said there are trees on both sides of his home and the <br />ones on the library side have been marked to remain in place. Mrs. VanAuken asked if any part of the <br />deck would show from Butternut. Mr. Stettin said a person might be able to catch a glimpse from <br />behind the trees. Mrs. VanAuken asked if there will be a railing and some steps going to the ground. <br />Mr. Stettin replied there will be. Mrs. Lord explained that the board tries to keep things non-visible <br />from the street. Mr. Stettin pointed out there is a large dogwood tree and a Japanese maple with a few <br />other small maples to block out visibility from the street. He mentioned that the city is tearing up parts <br />of the sidewalk. He said he spoke with the library building director who was on site today. Mr. <br />Dubowski said there was talk of a turning lane there. Mr. Stettin said the building director made it <br />sound as though the city owns part of the front yard. Mr. O'Malley said that sometimes with property <br />line issues, it goes to the center of the street but is subject to the right of way, which is to the inside of <br />the sidewalk. He added that the engineering department usually handles things like that. Mr. Dubowski <br />suggested that he talk with the engineering department to find out exactly what the plans are. Mr. <br />O'Malley mentioned the construction manager is George Daley. He would be familiar with the roadway <br />improvement plans. Mr. Stettin mentioned they are looking at putting up a privacy fence. They are <br />concerned about the possibility of kids going through the yard. He said he has not been able to get any <br />help from the city. He said he was inforined that at one time there were plans to have a fence along the <br />property line and that was cancelled because of the budget. Mrs. Lord said that generally they have <br />taken the stand that if something was not visible from the street, it was not something they had to be <br />concerned about. Mrs. Lord said she and Mr. Stettin have talked about it because it will be visible from <br />the street and from the library. She pointed out that Mr. Stettin is talking about a privacy fence. The <br />board is opposed to chain link fencing because it does not fit with the character of the street or the <br />homes. She pointed out that anything requiring a building permit on Butternut goes to the board for <br />review. There is always at least a two-week delay because there has to be a posting. W. Stettin <br />indicated he did post the public notice sign. Mrs. O'Rourke suggested they approach the fence proposal <br />as a safety issue because of the children in the area. Mr. O'Malley said he does not recall a fence being <br />part of the library project along the side lot line. Mrs. O'Rourke said that in the very early stages it was <br />part of the plan and it was a safety issue. There were other things dropped from the plans as well and <br />she believes it was a financial matter. She said the trees were slated to stay and that was discussed with <br />the previous owner of the home. That was going to be the barricade. She said that may have given them <br />reason to drop the fence. Mr. Stettin said it may be a natural buffer but there are some open spots. Mrs. <br />VanAuken said the fence does make an extra expense for Mr. Stettin since it will have to be a wooden <br />fence of some sort. She said that with plantings against it, it looks very nice. Mr. O'Malley asked who