10/21/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0- '.6 CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS OCTOBER 21, 2004 MINUTES 1. ROLL CALL: Chairman Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Chairman Puzzitiello, M. Conway, P. Engoglia, N. Althen ALSO PRESENT: Tom Rymarczyk, Asst. Building Commissioner and Planriing Secretary L. McNabb ABSENT: Asst. Law Director O'Malley II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: The Board of Building Code Appeals minutes for September 16th, 2004 are submitted for approval. P. Engoglia moved to approve the September 16, 2004 Board of Building Code Appeal minutes as written. N. Althen seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. III. OLD BUSINESS: IV. NEW BUSINESS: Theresa Krvsiak, 4170 Columbia Road WRD 1: Pttrsuant to Section 1331.05, Building Commissioner Conway has referred the order to demolish 4170 Columbia Road structures to the Board of Building Code Appeals. For conformation that a public nuisance does exist and that failure of the owner or parties of interest to demoiish the structure shall cause the same to be abated by the city upon being directed to do so by Council, in accordance with all the regulations and requirements of Section 1331.05. Note: This proposal was tabled by Board of Building Code Appeals on September 16, 2004. P. Engoglia moved to table this proposal until the next meeting. According to the building department, the applicant will have the structural or sanitary engineer reports available at the next meeting. M. Conway seconded, which was unanimously approved. Robert & Kimberlv Gabele, 26567 Waterburv Circle, WRD 1: Fence already is installed along property line in the rear yard. 69' of fence with gate to be installed along rear property line. This is in violation of building code section 1369.03. The applicant who had just moved into their home is requesting that a 69' fence be installed in the back of their property. There is a 10' CEI easement, 5' on each person's property. The City does not allow that two fences be parallel to each other. However, the applicant stated they would install a gate that would allow access to the area between their fence and Mr. Campo's residence, who is the Fairfax Lane resident who adjoins the back of his property. Mr. Campo said as long as the applicant recognizes that the CEI easement exists and will maintain the area, he has no problem with the fence being