My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/04/2004 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2004
>
2004 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
03/04/2004 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:45 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 8:52:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2004
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/4/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r ,. <br />C1TY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br />MARCH 4, 2004 <br />MINiTTES <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />. Chairnlan Maloney called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />PRE5ENT: Chairman J. Maloney; Board members; N. Sergi, T. Kelly, and W. Kremzar <br />ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Law Director B. O'Malley, City Planner K. Wenger, Building Commissioner <br />D. Conway, and Clerk of Commissions D. Rote. <br />U. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NIINUTES: <br />The Board of Zoning Appeals minutes dated 7anuary 29, 2004 have been submitted for approval. <br />W. Kremzar molioned to approve the January 29, 2004 minutes as written T. Kelley seconded the <br />motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />Chairman Maloney reviewed that there are 16 cases requesting 38 variances and 2 special pernuts. He <br />advised that Remington College had withdrawn from the docket. The Chairman advised that the board <br />members have viewed the premises involved for each case. Three votes are required for approval. In <br />addition, each case will be judged on the physical situation peculiar to itself, so that in no way is a judgment <br />rendered considered to be a general policy judgment affecting properties and like situations elsewhere. <br />M. SUII,DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />Stacv & Mark Faddoul; (PP# 231-01-128), 24086 Carla Lane: (WRD 2) <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new 4 foot picket vinyl fence. <br />The following variances are requested: <br />1. An 18 inch variance for fence exceeding height (code pernuts 30", applicant shows 48"). <br />2. A 12 foot variance for fence extending nearer the street line than building set back (code permits 0 ft., <br />applicant shows 12 ft.). <br />3. A 17% variance for 50% of fence open (see note) (code requires 50%, applicant shows 33%) <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (f)(1)). Note: This proposal was addressed by The <br />Board of Zoning Appeals on 12-04-03. <br />Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. Faddoul the owner came <br />forward to be swom in and review his request. Mr. Maloney reviewed that the board addressed the proposal <br />in December 2003. The applicants then requested their case be re-addressed at the boards January 29, 2004 <br />meeting. Mr. Faddoul reviewed that their home is on a corner lot. They would like to place their fence 1- <br />foot in from the sidewalk with a 90-degree angle at the rear corner not 45-degrees as requested. The board <br />felt that if the fence was placed 3-feet from the sidewalk with a 90-degree angle at the comer it would allow <br />visibility for pedestrians and cars. The board did not feel 1-foot in from the sidewalk would be adequate. <br />Mr. Faddoul voiced that if allowed to use a 90-degree angle at the corner then placing the fence 3-feet in <br />from the sidewalk would be acceptable. \ <br />J. Maloney motion to grant Stacy & Mark Faddoul of (PP# 231-01-128), 24086 Carla Lane their <br />request for variance (1123.12), as amended. Which consists of a new 4-foot picket vinyl fence and that <br />the following variances are granted: <br />1. An 18 inch variance fbr fence exceeding height (code permits 30", applicant shows 48"). <br />2. 10-foot variance for fence nearer the street line than building set back, the fence is to be 3-feet in <br />off the sidewalk (code permits 0 ft., applicant shows 10 ft.). <br />3. A 17% variance for 50% of fence open (see note) (code requires 50%, applicant shows 33%) <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sechon (1135.02 (f)(1)). N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was <br />unanimously approved. Variances Granted <br />2. Joseph & Maria Mowchan; (PP#234-25-114), 5790 Park Ridge Drive: (WRD3) <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of home addition.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.