My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/03/2025 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2025
>
Landmarks Commission
>
09/03/2025 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2026 11:47:39 AM
Creation date
3/9/2026 11:47:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2025
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
9/3/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LANDMARKS COMMISSION <br /> CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br /> MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 3,2025 <br /> 6:00 PM <br /> Mr.Neville called the meeting to order at 6:01 PM via an online meeting. <br /> Present: David Neville, Mark Madden, Gretchen Schuler, Sarah Egan-Reeves, Tom Dubowski <br /> Staff: Stephen Holowicki, Economic and Community Development Coordinator, Assistant Law <br /> Director Bryan O'Malley. <br /> REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> Ms. Schuler moved, seconded by Mr. Madden, to approve the August 11 Landmarks <br /> Commission minutes.The motion was approved 5-0. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> PLAN-000233-2025; Richard Whitt: 26840 Butternut Ridge Road. COA application <br /> The applicant proposed adding a dormer to the east elevation to the home and was asked to <br /> discuss the project. The applicant was accompanied by councilwoman Hemann. <br /> The applicant's objective was to expand a bumpout to expand the second-floor bathroom ceiling <br /> height. The applicant did provide roofing samples as indicated on the application. <br /> Mr. O' Malley reminded the chair to name the exhibit what is being shown to the trustees and to <br /> consider the applicant to be heard and then to allow time for questioning. <br /> Mr. Whitt addressed the commission with the roofing materials to be approved. Councilwoman <br /> Hemann declared that she presented to Mr Upton a photocopy of the drawings (on August 12th ) <br /> as ordered by the contractor,which more legible drawings were then distributed but should be <br /> retracted during this meeting that they were not intended for distribution. Mr. O'Malley <br /> suggested referring it as the Gerber submission. The applicant did not have anything to add. Mr. <br /> Holowicki reiterated verbiage from the last meeting and that the chair was seeking matching <br /> materials to the existing and for scale drawings should be provided. Holowicki also conveyed <br /> that the city recommended approval. Mr. Omalley discussed a drawing that was distributed that <br /> was not part of the application but received on August 12th by the administration. Mr. Holowicki <br /> asked for fmal clarification on the dimensions,which were labeled. 6x8x12 with a 3 foot base <br /> between the dormers,for materials sourcing and for an opinion of probable cost. <br /> Ms. Hemann commented that the Landmarks Commission is only a recommending body and Mr. <br /> O'Malley corrected her that it is prerequisite to a building permit. He further opined that the <br /> trustees should expect input from the city. <br /> Discussion opened amongst trustees regarding the history of the district and homes, individual <br /> properties,the SHPO entrusting the city's oversight as a CLG and finally the drawings of the <br /> proposal. Mr Neville mentioned that the dimensions were now clarified and should be ok. Mr. <br /> O'Malley stated that as prerequisite to the Landmarks application, a building permit should be <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.