My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-032 Resolution
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2004
>
2004-032 Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2014 3:58:25 PM
Creation date
12/30/2013 9:31:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2004-032
Legislation Date
3/2/2004
Year
2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 22 <br />BILL OF RIGHTS <br />22.1 A complaint against an officer must be substantiated or it cannot be used for <br />disciplinary action. An officer under investigation will not be compelled to make an oral or <br />written statement until that officer is informed of the nature of the investigation and, to the extent <br />known at the time, whether the investigation is focused on the ofFicer for possible criminai <br />charge(s) or disciplinary action. The officer will be apprised of possible disciplinary action to <br />be taken by the Employer if the complaint is sustained. Likewise, if the officer is under arrest or <br />is a suspect in a criminal investigation, the answers which the officer is asked to make to <br />intenogators, and information derived from such answers, will be used in a criminal trial, the <br />ofFicer shall be completely informed of his Garrity Rights andlor his Miranda Rights prior to the <br />commencement of any interrogation. <br />22.2 Before an officer may be charged with insubordination or like offense for <br />refusing to answer questions or participate in an investigation, he shall be advised that such <br />conduct, if continued, may be basis for a charge against him. No member shall be charged with <br />insubordination where such refusal is premised upon the exercise of Constitutional rights <br />afforded him in the case of a criminal investigation. <br />22.3 An officer sha.ll be informed of the names and addresses of all complainants. <br />Should the complainant be another officer, upon request, the complainant may be informed of <br />the na.me of the officer. The investigating officer of the complaint may be the complainant. No <br />officer of the NOPD shall assume the role and/or name of the original complainant unless he/she <br />is researching (an intemal) or criminal 'mvestigation. The officer under interrogation and the <br />33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.