My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-064 Ordinance
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2006
>
2006-064 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2014 3:22:43 PM
Creation date
1/11/2014 2:49:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2006-064
Legislation Date
3/8/2006
Year
2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Plan of Study for City of North Olmsted Phase I by Floyd Browne Group January 4, 2006 <br />2. Consider installing additional storage at the Clague Park Equalization Basin. <br />3. Install a shallower relief sewer to transport high flows by gravity to a newly <br />constructed Equalization Basin in Clague Park. This would avoid possible <br />replacement of the Walter Road Trunk Sewer and avoid rock excavation costs. <br />4. Assess a program of equalization tanks (EQ) to store and treat the excess <br />storm/sanitary flows. <br />Pump Stations: <br />Conduct more research and testing on some of the causes of low pumping capacity <br />at the eight-foot wet well level. <br />a. Vortex internal to the bell of the intake? <br />b. Stream lines setting up low pressure zones making suction difficult until the <br />bypass pump disturbs those stream lines and allows normal operation. <br />c. Add cones or angle iron on fillets disturbing the flow lines to avoid using the <br />bypass pump. <br />d. Test the three pump operation by using clean water to increase the wet well level <br />above eight feet to simulate a storm event. Observe what occurs at the eight foot <br />level that may be causing the reduction in pumping capacity. Determine if the <br />concrete platforms are an obstruction. <br />2. As the pump station flow is critical when three pumps are required during periods of <br />high sanitary flow, a cost effective analysis should be performed using at least one <br />larger capacity pump so that only two (2) pumps are required to take care of <br />emergency situations. This applies to both the LeBern and Dover pump stations. <br />The downstream system needs to be evaluated for available capacity. Downstream <br />improvements may be required for this alternative. <br />3. Acost-effective analysis should be performed by studying the increase of pump <br />capacity vs. removal of I/I from the system by a foundation drain/sump pump <br />program or by EQ basins to store, pump and treat. Theoretically, with an EQ tank <br />installed, no pump station improvements should be required. Typically, pump station <br />improvements at the LeBern or Dover locations will be expensive and may not be <br />cost-effective as a Transport Store & Treat option. <br />4. Other economic analysis studies should be used to compare the following: <br />a. An upgrade of the wet wells by removing fillets and bar screens to restore the <br />flow of three pumps and increase the wet well storage capacity. <br />b. Installation of an EQ tank that is filled from the by-pass pump at the stations <br />when the level in the wet well exceeds acceptable limits. <br />c. Constructing a second wet well to increase capacity and maintain isolation for <br />maintenance. <br />5. Any work that is performed on the wet well should include a change in the suction <br />bell diameter. This should be at least 1.33 feet in diameter. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.