My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-064 Ordinance
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Legislation
>
2006
>
2006-064 Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2014 3:22:43 PM
Creation date
1/11/2014 2:49:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Number
2006-064
Legislation Date
3/8/2006
Year
2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Plan of Study for City of North Olmsted Phase I by Floyd Browne Group January 4, 2006 <br />The soil type most predominant in the Dover drainage area is Mahoning- Urban land complex <br />soils. Again, this soil is poorly drained, has a perched seasonal water table of 12-30 inches <br />from the surface, and the permeability is slow to very slow. Run off potential of this soil is low to <br />medium. As in the LeBern area, the soil is better suited to buildings without basements. <br />A map of the soil types and soil surveys may be found in Appendix G. The topography tends to <br />be flat for both drainage the LeBern and Dover drainage basins and, as indicated in the soil <br />surveys, poorly drained. This was observed during the August 20th storm and documented by <br />pictures taken during and immediately after the storm. These conditions have an impact upon <br />the ability of the storm water to travel to the collection system for transport. <br />Floyd Brown Group recommends the following concerning the LeBern and Dover drainage <br />basin studies: <br />Model the main drainage artery in the LeBern area to find what result should be <br />in a 100+-year storm and compare the result to the observations during the <br />August 20, 2005 storm. The questions to be answered from this exercise are: <br />a. Is the flow getting away to the storm collection system? <br />b. Is the storm water showing a temporary high water table on top of the <br />rock base and getting into the residents basements to be carried away by <br />the foundation drains, yard drains, and sump pumps, which may be <br />connected to the sanitary system. <br />If the flow is not getting away and the water is gaining entrance to the <br />sanitary system through foundation drains and sump pumps, this may be <br />a major component to the sanitary sewer overflow situation in North <br />Olmsted. It may also be an answer to some of the observations of high <br />flows in the sanitary sewer with medium to low flows being observed in <br />the storm sewers. <br />2. A study of the economy of a solution to large amounts of storm water <br />entering the sanitary sewers may include: <br />a. Assess the older portions of the City where it is known that a high <br />percentage of homes have foundation drains tied into the sanitary <br />sewers and initiating a program of sump pump installation to rid <br />the sanitary of storm influence through foundation drains. <br />b. Assess a program of EQ tanks to store and treat the excess <br />storm/sanitary flows areas conducive to the system such as <br />Clague Park. <br />3. An evaluation of the local storm sewer collection and transport <br />infrastructure should be performed.' <br />a. From the residential home inspection study it appears that storm <br />water collects around the home foundation and cannot find its way <br />to the storm collection system. This water eventually finds its way <br />into the sanitary sewers. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.