|
September 1, 1.964 _ :;ag.> ?
<br />a member of Council, a member from the insurance company, and the Saie€,,,
<br />Service Director4 to review acc:identc oe,cu_r_;?i? luring the year and who was ent it lec3 t.o awards :
<br />On August 24, the CommitteP met with i,'astl,ak? a-ad Ridgeville with regard, •:E;
<br />the extens ion of the bus 1 ine to the is ci.i ies n S ince they found we ?ere_
<br />los ing a cons iderable amount of mortF yon the ext4nsian, a.t was sler., ic3ed f:
<br />discontinue service as of September_ 4, N'es,.sake and Ridgevill,- it-
<br />clared they were unable =c 'qalk° an", that they nare
<br />agreeable ro drcpTing the r,r,-ts, _
<br />•,_,-. ??,n n. K: - n_ _.?. _
<br />'?`he Transpr??_?. _ 'on C vommit¢ _ee a_s^ mp
<br />. 7°?±a._ r:?_ ;«? ????.? ?? ? .
<br />;lZSt.115S'i7n o?i a -or3y ._c-l r_"?.:t _x iCs_'?
<br />uf the FiYIaCYce an.?1 i1`a_zspG-?rqf . , )".Y:: i.ry11s1d2T' t}Zf'_lr
<br />,?6, -, .9.I .?,',.i?i'?JE?rL aiSo "_'2?Pstc?d a
<br />__ =.n6
<br />Committees to d go =:v?.r t_:gurv . c-- ?y 5e?v ,..ce. Dire,-tsavings possible with a new bus gaF: ?g-.,
<br />Mr. Leonard reported that th^ _;'-s.? ?r Co:_tr,i Com =?ree, o#' which he i.s ra .?
<br />man, had met and consicleres? ?ite twa requests for permif:s received fro,m f;E-;t.
<br />State Department af Liquor Control., "hay ? ?ec3n=ending that Councii_ ? -
<br />a resolution of objection -.r bot}: cases, •?,rice there are presently no bui;•_
<br />ings at either address, and according tc the Building Department< nca perm:;-,
<br />have been applied f c±r :
<br />Mr. Mangani reported his Plannir,g Cr_)mmitt?.<? ?et xugusi YBtic to consider +:3ie
<br />change in trao sublots in the Butter-auf Pei_gh?? SuLdivision. Mr. Labas x:ep<,?ted
<br />r'hat in s*udying the plans dracan fcsr t??A,? „hange he found a fave-FOOt error,
<br />and recommends that i t be hz?id up jan" ? I v?? ?? e fzarn-Lshed with a revised plat.,
<br />Mr. Mangani that with regard #o the prr?pose? zoning change ir? the Butternczt:
<br />Heights 5ubdivision to provLc3? ???kf_ng use of ozie lot on Luceydale, we ha«e
<br />received a restriction deed coverin„ a twenty--year period res±ricting ttse,
<br />use of the land to parking purpos^s anly, ~??? 'nouse ±o be used only as a
<br />residence. However, the Lac.° ?'? re^f:oY ; a- Yitiat rather than rezonc, we
<br />would have better control i_t w? e-r;r *,, grant a varianre, and the or;aners a7e
<br />taking the necessary actior: to gp}? tbe ?arjance4 '3'he i:lerk o£ vouricil as to
<br />notify the Board of Zoning Appea?s that Cc;uncil concurs caith the Law [JZre?-_i:-:,;
<br />in this matter.
<br />Mr. Mangani also repGrted that. T he BY?? tt,nr. R ;I;,.? #1 plai has been ?pvcb;=e ; 0V
<br />the Planning Committee far record purposes,and ?.egislat ion has been prepa.r eit
<br />for action at this Council meeting,
<br />The Planning Committee will meet with Saks and Goldberg to go over, their p I?_ri
<br />for apartments on Columbia Road.
<br />Chairman Mangani also presented pla:ns showing the proposed front entrance ot
<br />the Bretton Ridge Development, a matter that the Building Commissioner had
<br />referred to Council, The Planning Cnmmittee recommends that this be approved,
<br />Mr. Leonard bpposed the planting of bushes as shown, since he feels that
<br />such a planting, if permanent, can cause considerable difficulty in the future
<br />as to who is responsible for maintenance.
<br />
|