|
November 17, 1964 - Page 6
<br />for suspension of the rule requiring that there be three separate readings of
<br />the ordinances Motian was seconded by Mr. Limperts Affirmat.ive vote thereon
<br />was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr, Mangani then moved
<br />for suspension of the rule requiring that the ordinance be read in its entirety,
<br />seconded by Mr, Limpert, Affirmative vote thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr, Mangani then moved for adoption of the ordinance,
<br />seconded by Mr, Limpert. Affirmati.ve vote thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Manganf, West,
<br />Ordinance No, 64-275 was introduced by Mr. Limpert, To levy special assessments
<br />for the improvement by construction of sanitary sewers of certain streets comprised
<br />in Contract 4A of t.he City's Sanitary Sewer• Project, Mr. Limpert moved that
<br />the rule requiring three separate readings of the ordinance be suspended, Motion
<br />was seconded by Mr. Leonard4 Affirmative vote thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, Mr. Limpert then moved for suspension of the rule regnring the
<br />ordinance to be read in its entirety, seconded by Mr, Leonard. Affirmative vote
<br />thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani9 West, Mr, Limpert then
<br />moved for adoption of the ordinance, seconded by Mr. Leonarde Affirmative vote
<br />thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, ManganL West.
<br />Ordinance No. 64-276 was introduced by Mr. Foltz. To levy special assessments
<br />for the improvemenfi by construction of sanitary sewers of certain streets comprised
<br />in Contract 5 of the, City's Sanitary Sewer Project. Mr, Faltz mnved for suspension
<br />of •the rule requiring three separate readings of the ordinance, seconded by
<br />Mr, Mangani. Affirmative vote thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert,
<br />Mangani, West, Mr, Foltz then moved for suspension of the rule requiring read-
<br />ing of the ordinance in its entirety, seconded by Mr, Mangani, Affirmative vote
<br />thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr. Foltz then
<br />moved for adoption of the ordinance, seconded by Mr. Mangani, Affirmative vote
<br />thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert., Manganf, West.
<br />Ordinance No, 64-277 was introduced by Mr, West, To levy special asseessmenfis
<br />for the improvement by construction of sanitary sewers of certain streets com-
<br />prised in Contract 6 of the City's 6anitary Sewer Project. Mr, West made a
<br />motion for suspension of the rule requiring three separate readings of the
<br />ordinance, seconded by Mr, Limpert, Affirmative vote thereon was Foltz, Hodgins,
<br />Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West, Mr, West then moved for suspension of the rule
<br />requiring reading of the ordinance in. its entirety, seconded by Mr. Limpert,
<br />Affirmative vote thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert., Mangani, West,
<br />Mr. West then moved for adoption of th.e ordinance, seconded by Mr. Limpert. Af-
<br />firmative vote thereon was F'oltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West.
<br />Ordinance No. 64-278 was introduced by Mr. Mangani, T'o levy special assess-
<br />ments for the improvement by canstruct.ion of sanitary sewers for certain streets
<br />comprised in Cont.ract 8 of the Gity's Sanitary Sewer Prmject, Mr, Mangani moved
<br />for suspension of the rule requiring three separate readings of the ordinance,
<br />seconded by Mr. West, Affirmati,ve vot.e thereon was Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard,
<br />Limpert, Mangani, West. Mr. Mangani t.hen moved for suspension of the rule requir-
<br />ing reading of the ordinance in its entirety, seconded by Mre West. Affirmative
<br />vote thereon was Folt.z9 Hodgins9 Leonard, Limpert9 Mangani, West.a Mr. Mangani
<br />then moved for adoption of the ordinance, seconded by Mr, West.. Affirmative
<br />vote thereon was Fo1.tz, HodginsP Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, West.
<br />Ordinance NO, 64a279 was introduced by Mr, Mangani, A Resolution approving,
<br />for record purposes only, the proposed subidivisinn known as Bretton Ridge #3,
<br />and declaring an emergency. Upon advice from the Mayor that the deed had not
<br />
|