|
, September 7, 1965 - Page c
<br />The l:ommittee further° recotnmended tha* traffb? ?? Burns Road be lamited tf? ???-,•;;_
<br />bound betraeen th.e nrrurs of 3:00 P.M. and 4:36 P.M. and that traffic on Ekurn, Eoad
<br />be T imated to snutFtbound between the hours of 7e3U AeM, and 9 000 A.M. and that
<br />one-way signs be insta9.led. "Ctaey al?o recommcend that left-turre sP??s on Lorai:a
<br />at c;??umbia and at Clague lbe estsibYfshed, and new t.raffic lights insi:alled at
<br />these loceatimns. The Committee aTsa studied the progosed traf£ic, patterr? f::r.
<br />Lox°a in Road o
<br />Mr, Lfmpert, Chairman of
<br />regard ta fare increases
<br />to the inrrease was requ,
<br />the drivers a raise, He
<br />fare raise was for rates
<br />lccal ratesm
<br />the. Transpartat??n Committee, report€;d they met witi,
<br />on locaY and scl?ool btss fares. I,ega?slatron perta???;?ng
<br />asted. "I`he increase was necessary in orderc to give
<br />ca1led atter;tion to the fact that the Yast prevuouv
<br />?o downtown esnly, and ??tis raise wi1l affect on1y
<br />Mr, Mangani, Criaix°man, City Planning Gommittee, repax°ted the Piannirtg Comenis-
<br />sion has accepted preliminary plalt for Bretton Ridge #4 for r??ord pua°po^'?.1;
<br />on1y, and legislation will be requested uncier new busrness,
<br />Eacli councilman wras furnfshed wfth a copy of a letter dated September 2, 1965
<br />addressed to the President of Counci19 sbgned by W? L. C:erlach, Finanre Directnry
<br />irx which he advfsed that he was refusing ?? ?ertify fJrdi.nau??e No, 65m194 tr th6?
<br />Caunty Auditor because of hgs doubts, regarding the expenditure of fazrrds and the
<br />incurr ing of debt £or the publ a.c 1 fbrax°y,
<br />Mr. Dewey Limpert requested pulblicity on the fact that cfii'ldren usbng schoo1
<br />passes may have their passes hanored after the norman hours of anse, provided
<br />they have a written note from their teacher or coach stating ttaey have been
<br />at sch?ol activities, Ttais procedure was institasted last year, baat apparerr.t'Ly
<br />AFW is noG well kncszan,
<br />Mrse Jean 0°Brien, 5662 Burns Road9 questioned the proposal for or:e-way traffic
<br />during certain hours on Burns Road, and asked about getting out of her driveway
<br />sluring these times,
<br />Mrs, C. A. Shoop, 5693 Baarns Road, stated tha1t it is diff icult even ?ow to ge*;,
<br />otrt of driveways on the street during schasol fiours.
<br />Mr, ,7ack Konold, 5365 Buarns Road, stated he fs in favor of the prog??al far a
<br />one-way st.reet, ce there is such heavy traffic 8t schodY hours ar,d a?: ngghi,
<br />He taas part icaala? concerned about the traff ic, when there are evenang 8vhLool
<br />activities,
<br />Mrs. 0°Brien asked why tar and chip resurf acing was being used, ratnes than thi?:
<br />hfghiy recommended slurry seal,
<br />Mre Joseph Tracq9 5703 Burns Road, questioned why an access koad should not.
<br />LuiEt by the school on theiz• propertyq
<br />Mr, Francis Murray, 5495 Burns, feels any experase necessary for an access r?ad
<br />is warranted. He is vfolently Qpposed to atr„+o-way street, and bs coracerned
<br />about speeding on the road,
<br />Mrso Betty Hendrickson, 5672 Burns Road9 state¢i she felt Burns had become a drag
<br />strip, and that with onemsaay traff fc it wesuld tae a race track4 Zt was hex• observa-
<br />tion that on a. day such as today wlaen t1nere were r:o students but just the teayhe-:°s
<br />_ _ . ?
|