|
May 5, 1965 - Page 3
<br />facilities, and this they are trying to do an a very temporary basis at
<br />minimum expense. This would aerve for approximately f our years.
<br />The Clerk read a letter from Building Commiasioner Gundy regarding a
<br />petition requesting demolition and removal of a dog houee at 5830 Suneet
<br />Oval. He reported the property has changed handa and he is unable to
<br />contact the new owners by phone. Mr. Foltz further reported that at the
<br />preseht time the house bears a red *ticker f orbidding occupancy until the
<br />atructure is removed. Mr. Foltz further suggested that Mr. Gundy ao
<br />notify the new owners by regiatered mail,
<br />The President Pro Tem welcomed atudenta of the Problema in Democracy claeses
<br />from North Olmsted High School who were preaent at the meeting.
<br />Mr. Frank Pinkham, 6595 Barton Road, called Council's attention to the
<br />aewer construction and the probleme it is creating on that etreet,suggesting
<br />that perhaps Cotancil could appoint a committee to check out and correct
<br />complaints. It was auggested that promDt reporting of complainta to either
<br />Councilman West or the Safety-Service Director would be appreciated, and
<br />thattera would be taken care of. Every effort will be made to hold incon-
<br />venience to a minimum,
<br />Ordinance No. 65-88 was given its second reading. An Ordinance amending
<br />Codif ied Ordinance Title Seven, Chapter 351 entitled "Parking Generally"
<br />bk adding Sections 351,13, 351.14 and 351,15 relating to parking regulations
<br />during heavy snow storms.
<br />Reaolution No. 65-99 was given ita aecond reading. A Reaolution accepting
<br />the improvement plana for Sandy Ridge Subdivision No, 1.
<br />Ordinance No. 65-100 was introduced by Mr. Mangani, An Ordinance authoriz-
<br />ing and directing the cancellation of special aseeaements on Permanent
<br />Parce3' No, 231-22-43 being an asseaement for preparation of plane and
<br />specif ications for sanitary aewers, and declaring an emergency. Mr. ;4angani
<br />moved f or suspenaion of the rule requiring three separate readinge of the
<br />ordinance, seconded by Mr. Weat, Aff irmative vote thereon was Caeter,
<br />Foltz, Hodgins, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Weat. Mr. Mangani then &oved
<br />for auspension of the rule requiring reading o£ the ordinance in its entirety,
<br />aeconded by Ift. West. Aff irmative vote thereon was Caater, Foltz, Hodgins,
<br />Leonerd, Limpert, Mangani, Weet. Mr. Mangani then moved far adoption, seconded
<br />by Mr. West. Affirmative vote was Caster, Foltz, Aodgina, Leonard, Limpert,
<br />Mangani, Weat,
<br />Ordinance No, 65-101 was introduced by Mr. Weat. An Ordinance suthorizing
<br />and directing the cancellat ion of epecial aaseaemente an Permanent Parcel No.
<br />236-15-1, being an assesament for preparation af plana and apecif ieatione for
<br />sanitary aewers, and declaring an amergency. Mr. West moved for suapeneion
<br />of the rule requiring three separate readinge of the ordinance, aeconded by
<br />Mr. Leonard, Aff irmative vote wae Caster, Foltz, Hodgina, Leonard, Limpert,
<br />Mangani, West. Mr. West then moved for aueper?sion of the rule requiring
<br />reading of the ordinance in ita entirety, seconded by Mr. Leonard. Aff irmx-
<br />tive vote thereon wae Caster, Foltz, Hodgine, Lsnnard, Limpert, Mangani, Weet.
<br />Or. Weat then moved f or adoption of the ordinance, eeconded by Mr. Leonard.
<br />Aff irmative vote wae Caster, Foltz, Hodgina, Leonard, Limpert, Mangani, Weat.
<br />
|