07/02/1968 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

GounciY meeting 7-2-b8 Page 3 Mro Willfam O°Nta.iley, J743 Porter, guestione? ??? -Wide varxation in the amounts of the assessments in what waa apparently che same amou??t of frontageo Mr, George Polansky9 ?e42 ???l,?'er9 ?????ai??d trnat zvEn wrntre there are sidewalks installed chiidren waik in the street< He i&lF ???t Ithe road is in good enough shape f?r pe???? ??? ?ive there now, and ?hat ??e EichooY or the city want better access for tfie schoji busesy ???? Ehouid beat the cost, He gointed out that i.f then widen the streets and put ??.. &IdEwalks, there will very little room between hiv hL?use and the s4Grsez: Mro Edo Geschkeg 5770 Burns9 qucted ???????t,?_er i?om Councilman West in October of 1967 with regard to ditcIeso Mrs. M. L. Gustafson9 3771 Decker asked what was the limit you could be assessed on your property9 and stated aLcordin? ??? che ba?.k valuation, they would now be asse5sed 45%. MrA Jack PhiY1rps, 27785 SouLhern, staLed hiv situatgort was similar to Mrs,, Gustafsdn's, and quoted the affiount o? ??? estImated a5sessment on a vacant lot he owns, for whiLh he payd $19600, and on ????h i-* would be assessed $4,000o Mro Steve Leonard, 5$32 becker, compla-ned abouy the drainage in front of fiis houseo Mrso PHiIip Sullivan, 5785 Decker9 ??ated sYs? ??l?Leved they were being assessed to the poiftt where it wiYl be impossible cc, get out of their house what they put into ito Mrso Albert KortyrYa, 5853 Decker9 stated they are being assessed too highly for the value of the property,. Mr. John Wolf, 3438 Tree Lane, asked if something could be done about the parking of bikes, etco, in fronfi of stores in the shopping centers, where persons who are blind find them a hazard. Mro James Cater, 23499 Alexander9 representing the Community Council, reported on their review of gropmsed ordinance No. 68-97, They have no objection to the proposed inerease in the rates charged tvr the cabin, They do request, however, that in tIhe section immediately after "Iz??es" that rather than reading nregularly seheduled bi-Ynontfi1y me?tings", it be amendedl to read "regular meetings1° since they are contempYatir?g a change in tYneir meeting dates,: T"hey also advised th?? they have no objrctian to the pra-vision stating that the Community Cabin cannot be subiea?ed, At tfiis ?oint -a discussion ensued as as to subleasing, a.nd James Prok.as}r aslkedl. the ]Laes Director about the legality of it. Mr, Kitcher, advised that the ordlinance only puts in words what should have been Yaw alY a7Long, AYthough. the Comnunity Couxacil is given favorable exemption be?ause ?f t???? activities9the:r have no authority to sublease the cabino Mro Kitchen further stated on being questioned, that subleasing does not necessarily ix?volve money, It is the gsassing oxa oit a right that you have, whether it involves money or some other Yneans of exchange o