12/16/1969 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes 12-16-69 -3- continued f rom pag,e 2 read aad entered into the minutes of the next Cc+tmcil meting so that the record will reflect the refusal of Council to gvaQt a heari.At and mp objection thereto. Sincerely poeirs, Carole Jo Hanzes Moraney." Mr. 0'Neill then wsnt on to comment that there has been no xefusal an the part of Council to have a hesrtag. Hawever, at no time did Mr. Prokasy indicate that he had changed his reaidence, or moved out-of- tam. Therefore Council fe?ela that uo charge wss to be braught against him, and matter was droFped bq Council. Mu. 0'Neill than asked the Law Director if he wauld care to cousent on letter. Mr. Kitchen said Coua- ci1 "shail" determine qualificat3ons of its members. They "nay" further- more ho a heariAg and ask the Law Director to advise tlou, but then Council may do as it pleeses. The Law Director does not "thfnk" for Council. People addressing Gouncil, ae follaas: Mr. T. Gallagher, 28646 Lorain Road, apoke to Council about the North Olmsted 3ubdivisioa.. He asked wtat Council is ga?ing to study? Feels they are juat delsying. Wantsd to kaow what complaint Coood3., oz the committee, was regfsteriag, so that he can find out what is to be done. Mr. Prokasy, Chairsan of Desiga and Plstting Commi.ttee, xeplied thet because of comp2aints regiatered in that particular area by area resi- dents, and Mr. Gsll.agter, regardiag traffic access in porticular, com- mittee mst consider what cm be done, after thep receive report from Police Departuent an eurvey. A#ter further canvexeativn beCwaen Mr. Gallagher and Council aeubers, Pxeaident 0'Neill asked Mr. Prakssy when this problem might be resolved. Mr. Prolcasy said "within two weeka." Mrs. Gladys Zipp, 29658 Lorain Road, called Council's 8ttention to the figures "1305.9 (f) in titie of 4rdinance No. 69-210. It was ascertsined that this was a tqpographical error - should be 1205.9 (f). Mr. Clifford Cra6s, Butternut Ridge Road, called Councfl's attentioa to page 2, Ordinance No. 69-210 "seLback from a radfus." Felt words in this regard should be reworked. Mr. Prokasq requested Acting City Engineer Karhan to camnent. After further discussion on poiat in question, Messrs. Crabs, Karhan aad Ititchen agreed on satisfactory wording For thia point. This will be reflected a little later in minutes under this par- ticular piece of legislatian when amended and given second reading. Mrs. F. Shade, 29587 Laraia Ad., also had a question on Ordinance ldo. 69-210. Her question iaavolved person aelling his property and failiag to notify buyer about expiration date. Mr. Kitchsn said this ias up to awasr of record sixtq dayrs prior. If owner of record daee not appeal, his appeal would be lost to buyer. P.4, 1133.17 "expiration," If a per- son hae been granted a variance amd has taken advantage of variauce, they are "aon-canformi.ng." Non-ccnforming may continue, but if perscrn does nothiug for a period of 1.1/2 years, then reason no longer in existenee. Mr. J. Webster, 6011 3herwood Drive, questioned Council on Ordinamce No, Apok 69-216 , aince theq were setting up a achool token for local students, why was it not beiag done for Cleveland student8. Mr. Lispert said this has been discusaed but it becam" too complicated.