Laserfiche WebLink
Council 'Minutes of 4-6-71 Page -3- <br />go over the idea of pos ting a warning sign in store that this type of <br />eaforcement would take place in future. <br />2) re - possibility of ehort wsighed meats. Caunty inapecta at random <br />twice a month in sny store. Oace a persoa takes package from the store, <br />there is noa way o£ knowing what has hagpeazed to package before it is <br />wei$hed at home. If package is weighed at Produce Department isatead of <br />P4eat Departtment there wanld be an antomatic digfereuce dae to ttse faet <br />that the meat aca2es are fn hundredths of a poimd and other scales axe <br />in ounces.. Another eonsideratian is the weight of the traq and film <br />that covers the meat. Ccme3.ttee does not fee2 there is say instance <br />where astorelceeper would rsfuse to rweigh meat for a customer, sad <br />it is ttse Committee's ccnclwion theze is Ao need for specitic legislatioa <br />regarding this. Mr. Grady camonted the written report rir. A1+exmder aaid <br />he would send to Covacil regerdi.ag his study hss not beea received. <br />3) re - proposal by Citq of Brooicpark which 3s a resolutiQU to the Ohio <br />Legielature asking that ccmmercial property be taxed at a higher rate <br />than resideatial property. Mr. Grady will give copy of that legislatian <br />to Law Director and request legislatian cro sirme. <br />4) re - fessibility of assfgniag a certain number of policemen at a <br />public afgair baeed on number of pewple expected to ateend. Comnittse <br />felt this ehould be in Pub13c Safety Comfttee, and :`ir. Grady reQuested <br />President Pra Tea Limpext to refer propasal to the Fublic Safttp Ccrmmittee. <br />5) re - reqctiest far a revised ordinance resgard3,ng disorderlp ccnduct. <br />This, too, Camittee #elt sttauld he ia the Publi.e Ssfety Comsaittee aad <br />Mr. Gradq requested thst request be referred to that Ccrmmittee. <br />6) ra - lack of tiniformitp in our ord3sixttceas regarding working after the <br />normal retireant age of 65. Commi.ttee recomesnds and legislation will <br />be requested so that Ord. 66-4 will read s3ml.lar to Ord. 65-241. <br />Mr. Speedling, Chairman Euviranaiental. Control Coamittee, reapcrred th#.a <br />Committee met on Maxch 23, 1971. Under discussioa caass a poeasible ordinaace <br />for phosphate detergent si:ai.lar to Berem Qrdinsnce, possibilitq of lsgis- <br />lafiion an dispoaab1.e no return bottlea annd separation far recycliag. It <br />is feeling of Cami.ttee at this time not to move in any of these areas, <br />especially the phospt?ate aince we axe gofng inCO phasphate removal at <br />the plaat snd Che awmt of phosphate from detergeats apparentlp is inaigni- <br />ficant as compsred to ssaovnt that goes into sewerage in its entireCq. <br />Comdittee does not reccrosaettd legislation an phosphate removal. <br />Mr. West, Chsirman Building, Zouing & Develapment and Txansportation <br />Committees reported Buildiag, Zoning & Develapmene Committee has had <br />two meetings since last Cotmci1 meeting and following was diecusaeda <br />1) revitwed and will request legialatian for rezoning of a sma].1 piece <br />of property from B R;eaaidencs to Aiixed Use. <br />2) revietaed sud apgroved the chsage of the name of the boulevard in back <br />of the ehopping center to Caaterburq Road. <br />At this point ilr. Weat stated it was brought to his attention tonight <br />that the Fire Departaent does object to aaother Caaterbury Road. Lengthy <br />discussiccm ensued regarding extesisian of Csnterbury Ra6d, ete., confvsion <br />existiag aas of Great Northera Blnd. It wae decided ttlat this item will <br />be kept in Building, Zoning b Developmeat Committee for further study.