11/17/1970 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Gouacil tlinutes of 11-17-70 -8- : Norma Lingruen, 3364 West 231 St., asked if there was anyottur propertp on Larain Rd. that is zaaad further than 500 ft. for cosmercia2? Mr. West answered the Shapping Center. Diecuesion continued. Mr. J. Walsh, 23353 tioodview, daes not lilce the idea of proposal going to Planning Commission be€are resideetts ars noti.fied. Also, "ked how residents would go about resubstittittg I#asLer Plan; feels it would go through. Mr. Prokasy stated the maatex plan did aot pass basically because ma3ority of residents continually appeared and beeieged Council that it shauld not be passed. Mr. D. Connolly, Broxbourne Rd., feel.s Embassp and K Mart fs spat zoning and is a brea,eh af public trust. Mr. [iest expla3.ned the governing ruies of the Charter. Mr. West and Mr. Prokssy discusaed resideats, so:ne subdivisians, who are trying to reactivate thee Master P1an. It needs public support and feels it is a necessity that it be done at some point sad time. Mr. J. Rovelac, 4248 Martcm Drfve, feels people should have a say about rezoaing, aad questioned who makea decisian on rezoning. President 0'Neill answered that Council makes the decision, but not untfl Cauncil has listened to all of the pros and coas pertaining to garticular property under consideratian. At the Public Hearfng and Crnmcil meetings prfor thereto, residents do have a sap. Mr. E. Timothy, Broxbourne Rd., suggested Council delay a,pprov:l of center line of Stearns Rd. umtil decision hss been made regarding Bmbassy Deve7.ap- ment. Discussion continued. Mz. J. Heckerman, Hampton Dr., feels if center line is approved thexe w311 be no need for public tearing as to whether or not residents of NorCh 01.msted waat the road. Also feels road will dapreciate his property. It was explained to Mr. Heckezman that same is a Coeuntq road; public heariag was held initiallq 3 qears ago when road was firsL proposed by Countq; road can be put in regardlesa of whether Council approves it or not by right of emninent domain; bridge through Clifton Park was cited as an example of what can and wse dane. It xss also brought out the need for aegotisttng w3th the Couoty to bes?efit the residente of *tarth Olmsted rather thaa taking a megative attitude; also discussed Gmsent Ordinance which Council will vote on at a future time. Mr. R. Estes, Iiampton Dr., aaked if it is the obligation of the City ta paq 25% of costs ff center line is passed. Preaident 0'Neill said it would be regardless. Discussioa continued as to 4D City negotisting with Couaty as to location of road. Mr. B. Bailep, 5070 HamQton Dr., asked what happens to back].ot lsnds to the right of way?.