09/05/1972 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Council Minutes of 9-5-72 -2- Building, Zoning & Development Coasittes :aet on August 21, 1972, and reviewed the redesigned buffer sons of Gold Circle and approv9ed the buffer zone. Cor®tittee also approved final improversnt plsEts for the Brookparic Extension. At this time Mr. Gissser made a n~tioa that Council approve the final ieq~rcawrent plans of Brookpark Extension. Motion xas seconded by Mr. Bower. A#fismative vote Boshmer, Gissser, Limpert, Prokasy, Beringer, Speedling. Motion carried. At this time Mr. Gissser made a action that Council approve the buffer zone of Gold Circle Store subject to the type of shxubberq to be put in the area. Motion was secas-ded by Mr. Boehrsr. Affir~aative vote Boehrer, Gissser, Lirpert, Prokasy, Beringer, Speedling. Motion carried. Building, Zoning ~ Deveioptaectt Coami.ttee met on September 5, 1972; Messrs. Boehtaer and Gissser in attendance. Committee discussed and reviewed parking layout of Grant's Last Stand and approved same. At this time Mr. Gissser reds a motion that Council approve the parking lagrout of Grant's bast Stand. Motion was seconded by Mr. Boshmer. Affiz~uatiwe vats Boehmer, Gissser, Lampert, Prokasy, Beringer, Speedling. Motion carried. Mr. Prokasy, Chairman Streets & drainage Cveaeittee and recreation, Public Parks & Building Cs~ittee reported the folla+ing: Regarding Butternut Ridge Road proposal: Comittee's situation regarding ~i$ proposal is as follows: County requested approval fror Gity Council to prepare plans for the widening of Butternut Ridge Read. This was bout the extent of the Gaunty's letter. The County has to go through two specific types of action: (1) prelirinary approval by City Council before the starting of dr~ring of plans, (2) at a later time after plans haws been dra~rn, County must come back sand get from the City a Consent ordinance. Consent Ordinance has not been asked. lio plans of any fore have been appmved involving Butternut Ridge. Mr. Prokasy has requested the Engineering Degartsent to relay to the County Comp3.asianers sad the Engineer's Office the position of the Streets & Drainage Committee. has personally related to the County Engineer that their letter warn very unspecific. better discussed widening of Butternut Ridge Road - it did not say free what point to what point nor width and that the Streets ~ Drainage Come~ittee would not even consider their request until such tine as the Committee i~sar ams~et3~a$ specific to look at. This iat na prejudg~nctt of a~ proposal but at this mint the Committee has nothing to consider. Mr. Prolcasy suggested that at such t3~re as the County makes a proposal that is underatandabls, etc., Goweittes will b+e mare than happy, before acting on same, to sit down with the residents of Butter- nut Ridge Road. Regarding Stearns Road proposal which generally has been in Mr. T+1est's Committee. Mr. Prokasq felt in view of the County Coesatssionsrs' action recse-tly that it should be stated what Council's situation is at this titre. Tl~s Ce~ruaa~ty did re- ceive original approval from the City Camscil in 1970. The County bas to ante back and ask City Council for a Consent Ordinauaee. The Covx~ty has acted by a 2 to 1 margin to go ~?~ead nand prepare prelim4inaxy plans. County >aaot aid Council fir a Conser_~- ^,zdinanc:e. It will be soretirs e!f in the fti<t~sse before Consent Ordinance i ~.~,~uaste~, aa~d there will not be anything oo the of City Council concerning Stearns llc+ad until Covaaty faxmally raqu~rts a Comsat Ordinance. ,_