04/18/1972 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Hie~utss of 4-1g-7? Page -2- Mr. asst, t~aira~ H~tlding, Zoning b Ds~elop~-t Coa~ttse and Ras,~s Plamaiag Cossd.tA~re xa~retd Building. ZEE i D~ t Col~tttas met and discussed the follcmring: 1) Prsmk l~-ase Sabdivia~tiva- pn 1lor~t Park Drive a~ will req~sest lagislatia+a to ap~-rove for platfisg purpa-e~ss only; 2) Sandy Ridge Subdivisiog #1.Y final iasprt plains ash Baal plat sad will request lslrlsiativ® for a~roval of sas~t; Nr. F~test stead eresyon: of the Public Heasg oa Jlpril 24, 1972, g:15 p.m., City tbst.l, regarding parcel of lead an Lorain Rd. (Dog ~ Suds? ruing fress mis+acl use to coswsrcial. Mr. Hest scheduled a &iilding, ~ 6 Dewlope~nt Cassd.ttee mss-ting oa April 24, 1972, issadiately after Public Rearing, and raugt+sd all ambers of Council to attend if possible.. Letters, Connaunications: Clerk read letter frost Board of County Co~ssrl.asioners regwsting support of the Health and t~elfare Levy Aosrtewal. People addressing Council: Mr. Timothy Nesbitt, 15515 Detroit Rd., Attorney at Law, stated he has been asked by the p-embers of the 5eraiae Dept. to repr+ssent t~ir izetsrests in negotiating with the Fioanstce Cwstittee as to wage increases and overall acceptance of an Association of $mployeea, which word rs~-raarmt concerted interests of all hourly ratsd Service Dapt. emp-lo~ress regaling Retirement Systeat, Civil Service or Hage Earnings. Mr. Nesbitt asked that Council desig~aate representatives to meet and discuss the matter further. President O'Neill said Mr. Nesbitt wi11 be contacted. Mr. Delmar Ernest, 3tli06 Lorain Rd., questioned why proposed ordinance for reduced fares for s+utior citissrns vas restricted only to North Olmsted residents; why could this not be for any senior citiaea boarding the buses? Mr. 5peedling stated this was discussed prior to Ming and the ordinanee will be introduced and placed on first reading but prior to aacond reading it will be aoa'nded to include all riders not only North Olmsted residents. Mr. Reis, 4k29 Canterbury Rd., discussed CZ rk•~.n's rs~{u+ast for r:soning. asked what Council's attitude would be toward proposal; coaewmtted on petition he had signed by residents who are against the reaaning and gave reasons why they are against the rezoning; also asked if the petition would be good for future proposals. Mr. West said proposal was turned daaa by planning C~uission sad it has not been submitted to Council. Until the proposal is submitted to the Engineering Dept. and in turn, turned over to Council there is no further action on it. Mr. bleat explsin~l that until Council revises the proposal no attitude can be forssd; the petition can be presented to Council paw. Tteis petition would have no bearing on future proposals. Mr. hest explained the rights of property owners aa4d procedure of Council, etc. Discussion continued. .. ~~: