09/18/1973 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 9-18-73 -4-- t+tr. Prc-kasy, Chairssrn 3trests ~ Dtra,e Cdsrcitteaet..aa~t _ilmcxwtigt, Prri-lic Parks 6 awildiag Corrrfittee, r t;~ falla~, $t<reeq~ A i3~rafae t~amrd,t~e met an sarsl itess - 1) is ~. free igr. ~k ~t s~r~nts on ~ me Rd. hir. 1~ wss s+d+rlssd Caw~LA a~Zd bs es~+a id~adag it fa~resbly but all had to awe ~ tide asa~t costs inv+olw#. It is ~sderstood that Iir. Sbaciuelton will get basic to Coamittee after hs has discussed this witd- his agars involved; 2) Under i~ Barsis~ss Coamittes will request legislation authorizing Ssrviee Dirsctar to advertise far bias amci sutharisng i~-+ar to meter into a e~antract far netrsssary repairs to the sanitsry sewer system in certain areas. This is a continuing program that affects mainly the northeast arse of t3~ City where sertars were installed I2 pears ago and bays had some problems. The money has bssri appr+ops:ated grad budgeted for this; 3) re Far1~s 6 creation - Mr. Prokaey stated Council is in receipt of report concerning Ord. No. 73-37. Kr. Prokasy maned to aarextd Ord. No. 73-37, Page S of the AgressMSt attae~had amd part of the Ordinsnee, Wider Paragral-h 7 after first aente~e, by inr~srtion of: "The Board agrees that i# the aforesmntioned site is not tried far elementary school purposes within 12 gears frog date of this 11g~tea~tt title to said land shall r+aveert back to the City far recreation purposes." IYiotion seconded by Mr. Bosiwr. Affirdetive votes Boehser, Giesler, I.i~spert, Prokasy, Beringer, 3peedling, West. Motion carried. 4) Proposal imrolving recreation complex ~ hope to have report from Consultant at October 2nd meeting for Council review. Let tees L,Cos~uni cations Clerk read cicatian from Attorney George 1. 1~a'kin, enclosing copies of letters addressed to Mayor and Cot~cil by appro~cimately 150 resida:ts of Mick Rd. area objecting to proposed resaning of a portion of Msstidc 8d. frontage from single familty to multi fatrily, and requesting that zoning regt~st of Mr. Clingman be denied. l~hc. West commented that tie proposed resaning was at the request of a tamer of residents. After objsctians were heard at the Puirlic Hearieg, the psvple xd-o were for the resoning Yese au~rksd to submit a petition, Ordinance ~ mot brought up toni~t as Ca~saittse watrtad to talk to the people who vsr~e for the rasc~ng to see what has happened. Cavil is Hoar in receipt of petition objecting to this tenoning. As far as Mr. West is concerned proposed resoraing ras based on the fact that a majority of the people wanted the rezoning in that area. If it is found this is not so, Cometittee should act accordingly. Pg~le,,,r„ s~ i~ Go+~~ci 1: Mr. D~rtve 'l~ov~tch, '~ Whi tehavan Ave . , addressed Ccc11 regareii~ iolutioo in connection with PATH suit, and asked Council to state reran for their vote. Mr. Ron Wilamosky, 64x3 Surrey I3rve, dressed Cvr~ncll regardag Ord. lio. 941.03 and report of Mr. Giesler dueling with r~ ci or b7r Service Dot. regarding garbage collection. Mscusaion followed, Mr. Wixsr~swtky rs~~eed that Ord, No, 941.03 be rap$aled. It wee painted out that if gropasad lagia- lation becomes effective fire ordin~ece as it is would be repealed.