09/17/1974 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 9-17-74 -2- "" President O'Neill rtferred to letter written by Mr. Childs regarding Equalizatian Board request regarding sidewalk repair program. Mr. Goggle stated Council by law must serve as the Equalisation Board. However, the Committee has discussed Mr. Childs' letter with the balance of Council,~t is felt that the CvNOittse should research the evidence via reports from the Bngineering Department prior to the actual work in order that a fair hearing could be given in that Way. This is in process and will bs taken up at next meeting. These are the people that have sent objections in writing for various reasons; which letters have been seat to the Engineering Department to sake on-site inspections. Anyone having installed sidewalks is entitled to a wring before the Equalization Board if they desire same. Mr. Goggin discussed procedure. President O'Neill requested Mr. Goggin and his Committee to take into consideration letter from Mr. Zubricky. Mr. Giesser, Chairman Building, Zoning & Development Committee and Recreation, Public Parks & Buildings C4esidttee reported the B.Z.&D. Committee stet on September 10, 1974, and following itess were reviewed: 1) Thoatas Nisius Re- Subdivision which is two 40 ft. lots being subdivided into one ~ ft. lot and legislation for same is on agenda; 2)D. J. Caldwell Subdivision on Maple Ridge & Walter Rd. - subdividing of two lots and legislation for ease is on agenda; 3) Senior Citizen Section 23 Resolution: Requested by the Regional Housing Authority to change our original Section 23 Resolution by inserting the word "designed" for. The Committee felt that the insertion of this Word would change our original intent of the legislstion. The Committee's recoaoeadation is to leave the Resolution go to HtID and stand on its merits the Way it is; 4) Assembly of God Church expansion end Committee recommends approval. Mr. Giesser moved that Council approve the parking of the Assembly of God Church, seconded by Mr. Coggin. Affirmative vote: Giesser, Coggin, Lampert, Beringer, Sharpe, West, Wilamosky. Motion carried. 5) Chrysler Corporation Deveiops-ent: On application by developer we original required that evergreens be placed on the westerly border of the lot. The people evidently like the lilac bushes that are there; so that the Committee recommended the Building Department to inquire of the residents who that directly affects whether or not they want the lilacs or evergreens. Depending on What the residents choose as their favorite the Committee will go along with. To date have not received word back from the Building Department, as to final outcome. 6) discussed a matter that was already passed on the preliminary plans of Columbia Village Subdivision located in back of Dog & Suds. The preliminary plans were approved by Council and new We find out that there was an oversight. The plans do not meet the Code which requires a 50 ft. buffer - the plans only have a 20 ft. buffer. Mr. Giesser moved to reconsider the Colu~-ia Village Development far approval of preliminary plans, second~scl by Mr. West. Affirmative vote: Giesser, Coggin, Lampert, Beringer, Sharpe, West, Wilasosky. Motion carried. Mr. Giesser moved to reject the preliminary pleas of Columbia Village, seconded by Mr. West. Affirmative vote: Giesser, Coggin, Lampert, Beringer, Sharpe, West, Wilamosky. Motion carried. Preliminary plans of Columbia Village rejected.