02/18/1975 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 2-18-75 -9- Ordinance No. 75-54 was introduced by Mr. Wilar~osky and given its first reading. An Ordinance to approve, adapt and pact a new Traffic Code; to repeal ordinances in conflict therewith; to publish the enactment of new matter; and declaring an emergency. Resolution No. 75-55 was introduced by Mr. Lietpert. A Resolution of commendation for Charles "Bud" Best. Mr. Lie~ert moved fcrr suspension of rule requiring three separate readings, seconded by Mr. West. Affirmative vote: Giesser, Coggin, Limpert, Sariager, Sharpe, West, Willey. Mr. Limpert read res~alution in its entirety. Mr. Lampert moved for adoption, seconded by Mr. West. Affirmative vote: Giesser, Coggin, Lampert, Saringex, Sharpe, West, Wilamosky. Motion carried. Res. No. 75-55 adopted. Resolution No. 75-56 was introduced by Mrs. Sharpe. A Resolution urging cooperation with and support of a county wide legislative effort to for~eulate eud effect hand gun controls, and declaring an emexg+sncy. Ztrs. Sharpe moved for suspension of xule requiring three saparaCe readis-ga, seconded by Mr. West. Mrs. Sharpe gave reason for emergency clause: - deadline for required legislation is March 15, 1975. ROLL CALL ON M©TION: Affira~ttive vote: Coggin, Saringer, Sharpe, West. Negative vote: Giesser, Lampert, Wilasiosky. l~s No. 75-56 r+oeverted to first reading. Mr. Giesser explained his reason for negative vote: by his costnents before he is for some gun control legislatan;~~•aae n to pass a resolution that we are going to cooperate with the County. feel we can participate i.n and cooperate with them in drafting up samethi~g; also feel we on our owrt- should start o~rn investigation and drafting up of our own lsgislation to effect some gun control. Mrs. Sharpe stated that arty input that we could get from any outside source would be beneficial to the City and if we do get our own legislation it would still be beneficial. Mayor Christman asked Mr. Giesser if there would be anything wrong with at the same time moving with the County on this as it sets up votes. Discussion continued. Mr. Wilamosky suggested it 'go back to Cosr~ittee for further review and taken up at next meeting. President O'~ieill stated it will ga back to Committee. Ordinance No. 75-57 was introduced by Mr. West and given its first reading. An Ordinance establishing the cae~lement of the Recreation Departe~ent affixing the compensation to be paid the members therefore and repealing Ord. No. 73-77, enacted July l7, 1973. Under Old Business: Mr. Wilamosky referred to legislation 75-49. Sometime ago he introduced legislation requesting the State to take similar steps. At meeting referred to with Mr. Barrack he did discuss what priority Lorain Rd. section in North Olmsted had -where is it on 11st. Mr. Wilamosky wan informed that the State has been out in the City and they did respond to the previous resolution; however, they felt there were other areas in the District that required attention that were fax worse than areas in our City. He did acknowledge that there are areas of Lorain Rd. and suggested we send another resolution to them dseigQating eertain mess on Lorain Rd. - the State may look at it a little sore favorably. Mr. Goggia will take rec lotion into Committee. Mrs. Saringer referred to legislat~:an 75-26 and stated she would like to have a report from the Director of B Resources before eating on this legislation. Discussed asking for volunteers and wondered if some of these volunteers could not work in this position (aecre~tary? ox perhaps a pooling of secretaries from other departments.