Laserfiche WebLink
.'_ ~ <br />~_ <br />MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />OCTOBER 15, 1985 <br />7:00 P.M. <br />Present: President James Boehmer, Councilmen Bierman, O'Grady, Petrigac, <br />Saringer, Wilamosky. <br />Also present: Law Director Michael Gareau, Clerk of Council Florence Campbell. <br />Absent: Councilmen Rademaker and Tallon. <br />Public Hearing was called to order by President Boehmer at 7:05 P.M. <br />President Boehmer announced that the Public Hearing had been called with respect <br />to Ordinance No. 85-68, an ordinance providing for the amendment of the Zone Map <br />of the City of North Olmsted, which Zone Map is part of the Zoning Code of the <br />City of North Olmsted, by changing the premises hereinafter described from General <br />Retail Business District to Single Residence B District. President Boehmer asked <br />if anyone in the audience wished to address this legislation. There was no <br />audience participation. <br />President Boehmer announced that the Public Hearing had also been called with re- <br />spect to Ordinance No. 85-86, an ordinance aiaending various sections of and <br />creating new sections within Chapter 1221 of the North Olmsted Codified Ordinances, <br />entitled "Signs", thereby providing for the prohibition and eventual elimination of <br />pole signs within the City of North Olmsted. President Boehmer asked if anyone in <br />the audience wished to address this legislation. <br />Audience participation: <br />Mr. Mark Boepple, owner of Mr. Jiffy, Chairman North Olmsted Chamber of Commerce <br />Pole Sign Committee, stated that the three major goals of this ordinance appeared <br />to be safety, esthetics, and a solution with respect to the immunity doctrine; <br />does not feel the legislation fully and totally addresses these goals. Believes <br />there is a lack of communication between business community, local government and <br />residents of North Olmsted. Offered better cooperation in the future. <br />Mr. William Jackman, addressed traffic hazards as related to pole signs. They <br />are an attention getter as well as being a physical obstacle. Feels the pole <br />sign offers the best identification and is easily visible; does not distract the <br />driver's attention as much as having to look repeatedly for a less visible sign. <br />If an errant vehicle should hit a pole sign, the damage would be less than hitting <br />a more solid, structurally more substantial ground sign. <br />Mr. Joe Roppo, presented three photographs showing a section of Lorain Road as <br />it appears today, as it appears with pole signs removed and as it appears with <br />pole signs intact but with telephone poles and wires removed. <br />Mrs. Pat Bahas, realtor with Smythe, Kramer, reported that in talking with Sgt. <br />Novak, North Olmsted Police Department, she was told there had never been an <br />accident resulting from a pole sign. Sgt. Novak indicated that pole signs were <br />an aid to safety by being so visible. He suggested that they should be at least <br />14 feet high so if they should be hit, they would clear the car. Sgt. Novak also <br />suggested that the pole sign include the street address, at least in figures four <br />inches high. <br />i_ <br />