Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 10/7/86 _2_ <br />4) At the request of council, a meeting was held with Bill Peinert, Superin- <br />tendent of Schools. The school guard program, if run by the school system, <br />would almost double. The lowest paid, part time person on their payroll makes <br />$6.00 per hour, with benefits. If Ordinance No. 86-87 passes, the city will <br />only pay school guards a high of $4.67, with no benefits. Safety Director Becker, <br />Budget and Management Director Cunningham and Mayor Petrigac had a second meeting <br />with Superintendent Peinert at which time he pointed out that the school system <br />could not pay for the parochial school .guards. School guards work about 54 hours <br />per day, which amounts to $46,500 the city is presently paying. Butternut School <br />has two guards with a total of eight hours daily; Maple School has three guards <br />with a total of twelve hours daily; Pine School has two guards with a total of <br />eight hours daily; Spruce School has two guards with a total of eight hours daily; <br />St. Brendan has one guard with a total of four hours and St. Richard has three <br />guards with a total of twelve hours. 677 of the budget for school guards, amounting <br />to $31,155, goes for public school guards; the balance for parochial school guards. <br />If council will give the Mayor its determination, she will write the school system, <br />asking them to underwrite the public school system's portion. <br />5) The last part of the Mayor's report covered the state of the Rec Complex Roof; <br />Mr. Fattlar and Mr. Fabek presented a report and slides which showed the deterioration <br />of the roof and ceiling. <br />Law Director Gareau reported: 1) Attended a pre-trial Iast week in front of <br />Judge McMonagle on the Seven Hills versus the-City of Cleveland Case. In 1976, <br />council had adopted a resolution agreeing with the Seven Hills case. They were <br />trying to regionalize the Cleveland Water System. The lower court had, in fact, <br />regionalized it; it was reversed by the Court of Appeals and then the case was <br />settled. In the settlement entry, the attorney for the plaintiffs reserved the <br />right of the court to retain continuing jurisdiction for the purpose of assessing <br />attorney fees. At the pre-trial, Law Director Gareau raised the question of the <br />statute of limitations because they are seeking in excess of $14,000 from the City <br />of North Olmsted. When a second resolution was offered to council, council re- <br />jected it; Law Director's position is that .the City of North Olmsted never hired <br />the services of Mr. Slifka. He has two weeks to brief the city's positon in the <br />form of a motion to dismiss; will be submitting that within the next two weeks. <br />2) A case is presently pending before the Bureau of Employment Services, dealing <br />with one school guard who has filed for unemployment compensation when she was <br />off during the summer break. She is the only school guard to do so and the <br />bureau has awarded her unemployment compensation for each of the three years she <br />has done this. This year, when it was brought to the Law Director's attention, <br />he has contested it. The law provides that if an individual works for the Board <br />of Education and is a seasonal employee, then. there is no unemployment compen a- <br />tion when they are off season. The only reason the bureau has continued to give <br />her compensation, even though it is seasonal., is simply because there is no firm <br />agreement between the School Board and the City of North Olmsted with respect to <br />these positions. Will hold a pre-trial conference at 7:30 P.M. tomorrow, by <br />telephone, in which all parties will get an opportunity to present their positions. <br />3) Has presented the city's complaint to .the Court of Common Pleas with respect to <br />the Halleen matter. Has had a number of continuances simply because the city has <br />been unable to get its expert to look at the situation. Law Director was at the <br />truck lot last night because he was informed there was a different kind of bulb in <br />one of the lights. Although the glare was somewhat reduced, it probably is not <br />significant enough to resolve the problem. Has conferred with Mr. Tallon; in the <br />next week,. will contact an expert to present some kind of proposal to eliminate <br />the glare when these lights are turned on. <br /> <br />