Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 11/17/87 _4_ <br />Mr. O'Grady asked why the city had discontinued the enforcement of tax <br />collections in 1984. Mr. Boyle stated they have to be authorized by a Tax <br />Administrator and the city did not have one in 1985; the present Tax Admin- <br />istrator has not authorized RITA to follow through in 1986 and 1987. Mr. <br />Boyle had become concerned and asked Mr. Chips of RITA if the proper procedures <br />to be followed had been discussed with the present administration. Mr. Chips <br />replied that it had been discussed. Mr. O'Grady asked if the taxes could be <br />recovered from 1985, 1986 as well as 1987. Finance Director advised that RITA <br />is all the way back to 1982 right now and all the administration has to do is <br />authorize Regional Income Tax Agency to go to court. <br />Mr. Wilamosky asked Mayor Petrigac if there was sone specific reason why her <br />adminstration has not pursued court action to collect on delinquents through <br />Regional Income Tax Agency. Mayor Petrigac said that this is the first time <br />the issue was brought to her attention; this is the first time she heard of <br />it; it is difficult for her to instruct anyone to do something that she did <br />not know had to be done. Mr. Wilamosky pointed out that a Council-of -the- <br />Whb1e Committee Meeting had been held during Mr. Logan's tenure, at which time <br />a representative from Regional Income Tax Agency addressed members of council <br />on the action necessary for collection and at that point in time, Mayor Petrigac <br />was a member of council and was informed. <br />Mr. Tallon asked if there was an additional cost for the RITA Law Department to <br />handle this matter. Mr. Boyle replied that the tax payer can be made to pay <br />court costs. If he does not show up, fie can be found in contempt. While RITA <br />tries to keep the penalty and interest below the tax itself, if a person is <br />charged and fined for contempt of court, it can exceed the tax itself and be <br />quite costly to the tax payer but it is not costly to the city. <br />Mr. Bohlmann asked if someone at RITA stated that the current administation had <br />been talked to in regard to going beyond the subpoena process. Mr. Boyle re- <br />sponded that RITA stated they had personally talked to the current Tax Admin- <br />istrator and further, if there was any confusion, would be willing to again <br />address council on the correct procedures for collecting taxes. <br />Mr. Wilamosky moved that the Council hereby directs the administration to pur- <br />sue the implementation of court action against individual as well as corporate <br />delinquent income tax payers, second by Mr. Tallon, unanimously approved. <br />Mr. Wilamosky, Chairman Finance Committee reported: I) Finance Committee met on <br />November 11th. All members were in attendance as well as Service Director Noble. <br />Committee discussed Ordinance No. 87-11$ which authorizes advertising for carbon <br />for use at the Treatment Plant and has no objection. <br />2) Also discussed was Ordinance No. $7-113, increasing the Petty Cash Fund at the <br />Senior Center from $200 to $300, and committee has no objection. <br />Mr. O'Grady, Chairman Safety, Health and Welfare Committee reported: 1) Committee <br />met on November 9th with Mayor Petrigac, Director Noble, Captain Krynak, President <br />Saringer, Councilmen Wilamosky, Tallon and O'Grady in attendance as well as a <br />representative from Traff is Pro Consultant, Incorporated. Committee discussed <br />the traffic congestion at I480 and Clague Road. When Fairview Bridge closed, <br />council put in a "no right turn on red" at westbound Brookpark at Clague with the <br />intent to allow vehicles south on Clague an opportunity to get onto 1480. <br />Traffic Pro proposed to eliminate the "no right turn on red" and let the traffic <br />flow; committee objects to this proposal. <br /> <br />