03/03/1987 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 3/3/87 -9- LEGISLATION (cont'd): Ordinance No. 87-25 introduced by Mr. Rademaker was given its first reading. An ordinance authorizing the Mayor to enter into a cooperation agreement with the Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners for the utilization of funds made available by the Housing and Community Development Acts of 1974,.1977, 1980 and 19$3, as amended, and declaring an emergency. Mr. Rademaker moved for suspension of rule requiring three readings as well as referral to committee, second by Mr. Wilamosky, unanimously approved. Mr. Rademaker moved for adoption, second by Mr. Wilamosky, unanimously approved. Ordinance No. 87-25 adopted. Miscellaneous business: Mr. Wilamosky scheduled a Finance Committee Meeting for Monday, March 9th, at 8 P.M. and asked Mayor Petrigac, Director Noble, Director Cunningham and Superintendent Crider to be in attendance. A Finance Commitee Meeting was also scheduled for Wednesday, March 11, 1987, at 8 P.M., with Recreation Complex Manager, Tom Fattler, requested to be in attendance. Mr. Wilamosky announced that the council had received the recommendations of Mr. James M. Mancini, Fact Finder, in the case of the City of North Olmsted and the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1267. Mr. Wilamosky moved council reject the Fact Finder's recommendations, second by Mr. Tallon, unani- mously approved. President Saringer requested Clerk of Council to send a certified letter to the Fact Finder informing him of council's decision. Mr, Logan scheduled an Intra-Governmental Relations and Legislative Committee Meeting for Monday, prior to the Finance Committee Meeting, to discuss the proposed Rules of Council amendments Mayor Petrigac reminded everyone that there would be a Council-of-the- Whole Committee Meeting on Monday, March 9th, at 7:15 P.M., to discuss the Needles Study, I-480 Exchange. Mr. McKay scheduled a Streets and Drainage Committee Meeting, to be held jointly with the Finance Committee, on March 9th, Monday, at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Tallon scheduled a Building, Zoning and Development Committee Meeting for Monday, March 16th, at 7:30 P.M. and requested Acting Building Commissioner Sanker and City Engineer Schaller to be in attendance. Mr. Wilamosky discussed the Kenny King and Halleen plans as presented to Planning Commission and the BZD Committee of Council. The plans required the Kenny King developer to construct a fence on the east side of his property line, abutting Halleen truck lot. Halleen's plans required a fence to be constructed on his west property line, abutting Kenny King. There was no objection to two fences, back to back, since they would serve a double purpose in shielding the lights from the homes on Decker Road. There are not two fences; there is only one fence. Question: who owns the fence? The development plans as submitted and approved by council and the Planning Commission show a fence on both plans - the Halleen plans as well as the Kenny King plans; someone did not erect a fence as called for by the plans and is in violation; would encourage a discussion with the Law Department and a citation for noncompliance with the plans. Would Like the administration to have the Building Department investigate as to who is the owner of the fence. Law Director Gareau stated that if somebody feels it is un- necessary to have two fences, he should come back through the same procedure as before and undo what was done. Who owns the fence? Who does the city seek to enforce against if it does not know whose fence it is?